KevinKIRO Kevin McCarty
Judge Kathryn Nelson re: custody of #susancoxpowell kids. Ruling: "The children cannot be safely returned home at this time"
@KevinKIRO
Kevin McCarty
Judge will not return kids of #susancoxpowell to father Joshua Powell. Asking about her parents now. AG says "Only viable relatives"
:great::great::great::great:
:rocker::rocker::rocker::rocker:
:rollercoaster:
Boy was I glad to read this! In court myself all day and so I didn't have a chance until now.
@KevinKIRO
Kevin McCarty
Joshua Powell agrees to psychological evaluation in effort to regain custody of kids with #susancoxpowell in the future and have visits
2 minutes ago via web
Favorite Retweet Reply
This is a BIG development!
It is. But, having read a gazillion of those evals, I know that some sociopaths are good at hiding the reality of their psychology. They often come off as "deceptive" or "unable to read."
Brooke4Trib Brooke Adams
Josh: Sons should have as much visitation with me as possible, overnight and weekends and supervised visitation is not required.
Don't ya' just love how he tried to school the judge with what was and was not required? After she just ordered supervised visits? Ha ha ha ha ha!!!!
Wow Josh sure does have a problem with Church and God. Well let's just see what that loathing will do for you Josh ....
Yeah, and why does he get to determine whether or not they got to church? Their mom is religious. She's LDS. She insisted her kids go to temple. Shouldn't her beliefs have some weight? If he so loves his missing wife and just wants her home, why is he against them going to her church, you know, the one they were raised in until he murdered their mom?
Didn't he just talk about how the boys wanted to leave the foster home? Something about them wanting to come "home?" Well if they can't come home, it looks to me like the second best thing "in the best interest of the children" would be to go with a kinship placement. Esp. since the boys "home" is now being rented out is my understanding.
Yeah, I remember that. he said they were upset. Well, they are not anymore, you unusual person you.
So in a typical custody battle, the one with the most financial resources wins?
Not necessarily. As some have already stated, in most custody cases, if one spouse or parent has more money, he or she may be ordered to contribute to the other party's attorney's fees.
In cases of guardianship cases, there are no such attorney's fees orders. At least in California. In juvenile dependency cases, like when the state took the kids and the court needs to rule, usually, a parent without funds can be appointed an attorney, paid for by the state. Again, in California, at least.
What about legal aid....or maybe they wouldn't touch it with the allegations out there?
I do some work for Legal Aid. We do a ton of divorce, custody and DV cases. That's all I do for them. But, they have a lot of leeway when it comes to deciding whether or not to take a case. Legal Aid folks are not the type to want to take a case for a guy like JP.
Also, he would have to qualify financially. He would have to have virtually no property and be declared indigent. I don't know his situation but I have a feeling, since he has been supported by daddy (they look at the last few weeks at least of income sources) that he would qualify.
I only just finished reading this thread, didn't listen to the live feed. A few notes of mine:
1-Josh didn't want them to go to church for a reason and I do not think it is his hatred of the Mormon church. I think the children will be exposed to more of Susan's friends and those kids will remember something or tell someone something.
2-Josh able to choose what councilor the children will have was a big win for him. This worry's me. How many pedophiles have respectful careers? If JP and SP are in a network they would know one of them.
3-The Child going to his school I understand but I'm willing to bet major money that I don't have that JP will attempt to see his child there.
4-JP when he has his supervised visits will attempt to instigate a situation to have the children removed. Either by tattling on the Cox's or accuse the person supervising with something. My guess is JP will constantly complain to where the Children will be returned to foster care.
5-The Cox's has a win but it wasn't a big win for JP still is controlling. I believe the Judge should have been more stern then she was.
Does the Mormon Church have evening church or non Sundays? LOL
Also as others have said, JP cannot choose the counselor. He can have input, meaning he is supposed to come to an agreement with the other side.
I don't think he will have any luck instigating anything. If he acts inappropriately during visits, they can cancel the visit and the Coxes could file to eliminate them altogether.
JP has only supervised visits with the Coxes. That means he cannot see them outside of those visits. He cannot go to their school to see them. Likely, the school and the teachers will be given a copy of the court order and they will follow it.
This was a MAJOR loss for JP. I am beyond happy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I hope he rots and soon.