LimoDriver
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2013
- Messages
- 169
- Reaction score
- 0
and it's down again
So if the jurors can only deliberate till 4:30 p.m. why even bother asking them to choose their own schedules? Surely they can deliberate late into the evenings if that's what they want?
According to Jean Casarez, Jodi would be executed in 12 years max, if she gets death penalty. She would be 44.
Nurmi didn't object that it mischaracterized the evidence. Juan knows what he's doing.
Of course they can
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
She did not say that she injured her finger while she was stabbing Travis. I remember the exchange quite clearly and Juan mischaracterized that testimony.
She merely said yes to a question about hurting it that day. Juan did not need to go further than that.
Just an FYI why time of deliberations is not indicative of the verdict:
O.J. Simpson was acquitted in less than four hours.
Phil Spector was convicted in 30 hours
Robert Blake was acquitted of first-degree murder in 35 hours.
Scott Peterson was convicted of first-degree and second-degree murder in seven days.
The Menendez brothers were convicted of two counts of first-degree murder for killing their parents in four days.
Of course, the woman we do not speak of was acquitted in ten hours and 40 minutes.
So, there is not much of a pattern to rely on. :twocents:
Because you have to know that by now we've all had our Lifestyle Lifts and are beautiful people. Plus, we have all watered our lawns with our Pocket Hoses and have manicured lawns. :floorlaugh:
Unbelievable timing and need to for the MILLIONTH time throw Martinez under a bus. It's incredible. :help:
I am using AZCENTRAL.COM/SMS/SIGNUP news alerts. They are the ones who do the live feed, and so far the text alerts have been working. Hoping they continue!
HLN saying until the usual 4:30
I did not like some of Juan's final closing. He mischaracterized Jodi's statements about the left finger. She never said that she injured it while stabbing Travis. It reflects badly on him to stoop that low. She was tripped up under cross, merely saying "yes" to the question about sustaining the ring finger injury on June 4th. That's it. Sadly, he didn't even have to mischaracterize it, just point out that she told Flores that the finger was injured on the day she killed Travis. That's all he needed to undermine her account about breaking her finger, as it contradicts her account on the stand.
His theory of the crime regarding the stabbing and ceiling pic is ridiculous. You exit the bathroom with the camera in hand to obtain the knife and then come back with the camera in still hand and then proceed to stab him? That stretches credulity to its extreme. He could have said that AFTER the ceiling pic, she exited the bathroom and dropped the camera down the hallway as she went for the knife or gun and then returned to the bathroom to kill him. This theory explains how the camera ended up down the hallway. It's far more plausible. I hope a juror isn't going to think, "well that theory of his is absurd and Jodi's does make more sense, so she must be telling the truth".