Irish_Eyes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2008
- Messages
- 4,060
- Reaction score
- 1,594
Dad made the allegation but a judge felt secure enough
in the belief that it was true to order her to not consume
alcohol in the presence of the kids. So to me, that sounds
like the allegation had some merit to it. Maybe the kids
confirmed it? Who knows? But it's not just an allegation
once a judge makes orders.
If one parent makes allegations about alcohol or drugs and there is a lot of proof (a recent arrest, the parent is fired for drinking on the job, or worse shows up to court drunk, etc.) I have seen judges suspend visitation until the other parent completes a drug and alcohol assessment, or drug testing for a period of time, etc. They don't play around.
The fact that this was just an order not to consume alcohol around the kids, I've seen that a lot in instances where the judge has an allegation, but no real proof. It's a no brainer for a judge because for a parent who is not an addict, this will be a very easy request to follow - it's not overly restrictive. The judge does NOT have to find the allegation to be true in order to put something like that in place.