Confusion
Creative Spelling Expert
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2012
- Messages
- 5,275
- Reaction score
- 6,274
I would have respecting Marc Klaas' take on the situation more had he not just taking a strangely worded statement from one person as fact, without bothering to verify it with the other person or find out if it really happened that way. MOO
I have a lot of respect for him and what he has done in the past (and will probably do in the future), but I think he was really wrong in this case. I'm not saying he's wrong about who did what to Dylan because there isn't enough evidence available to us to know one way or the other. My problem with his statements in this case is that, knowing the reputation he has, he sat and told millions(?) of people that this man is a rotten person and killed his own child with absolutely no solid evidence to back it up. All he seems to be basing it on are the statements of the man's angry ex-wife. Any time the two make conflicting statements, he assumes that she has to be the one telling the truth - in spite of the fact that she has recanted, or completely changed many of her statements, while he has remained consistent in his.
I'm sorry, but I do get tired of seeing someone condemned for doing something after having a child disappear, while someone else is given a free-pass because of being a grieving parent for doing the same thing . A word to the wise NG and MK (who should already know), Fathers are often grieving parents too! MOO but that's enough about me.