ab01
Ooh Rah
- Joined
- May 10, 2016
- Messages
- 3,818
- Reaction score
- 34,598
For the love of God, could this result in the technicality that TS so desperately needs?
Not a chance imo
For the love of God, could this result in the technicality that TS so desperately needs?
For the love of God, could this result in the technicality that TS so desperately needs?
I don't think it was posted on Websleuths until it was unsealed by the judge. Once it was leaked to SM sites they had no choice but to release it.Oh No. Is everyone accounted for on here? I wonder if this is Websleuths?
The Adams County resident was charged with official misconduct, a class-2 misdemeanor, and cited Tuesday morning by an investigator with the Adams County DA's Office. The charge indicates that whoever leaked the affidavit was a public servant.
A judge had sealed the affidavit to the public, but it was ordered unsealed after it was leaked to social media groups. A statement from the 4th Judicial District Attorney's Office says the person accessed the affidavit and released it to an online website that tracks crimes.
Oh No. Is everyone accounted for on here? I wonder if this is Websleuths?
The Adams County resident was charged with official misconduct, a class-2 misdemeanor, and cited Tuesday morning by an investigator with the Adams County DA's Office. The charge indicates that whoever leaked the affidavit was a public servant.
A judge had sealed the affidavit to the public, but it was ordered unsealed after it was leaked to social media groups. A statement from the 4th Judicial District Attorney's Office says the person accessed the affidavit and released it to an online website that tracks crimes.
I was joking about Websleuths, sorry in poor taste.I don't think it was posted on Websleuths until it was unsealed by the judge. Once it was leaked to SM sites they had no choice but to release it.
I hope this does not become a problem. Wasn't it due to be unsealed in a week or two, anyway?
The public servant who leaked it is in trouble, though.
Imo
Yes, I remember once it was leaked it didn't take long until it was officially released. We were wondering if someone made a mistake or the government official or employee leaked it intentionally.I was joking about Websleuths, sorry in poor taste.
It was all over the internet.
The judge did deny this requested sanction against the DA's office. I guess they got the leaker though.
Pulled from sanction request:
At paragraph 7 of Ms. Stauch’s Motion, defense counsel alleges that “Through investigation, the defense has learned that the original affidavit listed in the e-filing system was replaced with the redacted version of the affidavit. The redacted version of the affidavit was not sealed, and instead was accessible to the public.” Again, counsel fails to set forth any specific facts in an affidavit that were revealed through counsel’s investigation. This is important as the Court issued Order O-06 unsealing the affidavit at 11:20 a.m. on April 3, 2020. Any changes regarding the replacement or unsealing of the affidavit of probable cause after that point in time would have occurred as a result of this Court’s Order.
Exactly. What they are doing is passing the buck. There was no intent to cause harm, and no one “knowingly” did anything. A clerk screwed up.The problem is I’m not sure they are going after the Person who mistakenly put the unsealed document in the efile system.
It seems as though instead they are going after the person that noticed it and uploaded it. Whether they knew it was not to be made public or not will be decided in court
jmo
LOL- I just saw this and jumped in here to post it . YIKESPress conference live stream link:
Live on Livestream
Yes it does make a difference , GS parents had the right to see , what we were able to read , first . CID would have talked parents through the points on the AA before the general public ( US ) could devour it .I don't think it was posted on Websleuths until it was unsealed by the judge. Once it was leaked to SM sites they had no choice but to release it.
I hope this does not become a problem. Wasn't it due to be unsealed in a week anyway? I don't see what difference it will make.
The public servant who leaked it is in trouble, though.
Imo
Exactly. What they are doing is passing the buck. There was no intent to cause harm, and no one “knowingly” did anything. A clerk screwed up.
This will cause a headache for the wrong person, but won’t have any impact on the case whatsoever. The judge already told the defense to go pound sand, as this person isn’t a party to the case.
Even if they were a party, this wouldn’t help TS.
How he died is important, and they’ll likely have the full autopsy results at that point, to include toxicology.Agreed that this is a nothingburger.
I'm really focused on the fact that DDA Allen verified that covid-19 hasn't changed the date of the upcoming preliminary hearing, and that we're still on track for the June 5th and 8th hearings.
Not only will we learn more about what the prosecution has gathered in terms of evidence against TS, we'll also likely see a massive document dump on the court website once that preliminary hearing is completed, including arrest warrants.
I wonder if any of the autopsy findings will be released in the preliminary hearing or not…what do you think?
JMO.
So, the big takeaway I got from DDA Allen's presser was that LS's preliminary hearing is still scheduled for June 5th and June 8th, and that he looks forward to presenting the evidence to the judge at that time.
We're only a month away from the next big step toward justice for Gannon.
Agreed that this is a nothingburger.
I'm really focused on the fact that DDA Allen verified that covid-19 hasn't changed the date of the upcoming preliminary hearing, and that we're still on track for the June 5th and 8th hearings.
Not only will we learn more about what the prosecution has gathered in terms of evidence against TS, we'll also likely see a massive document dump on the court website once that preliminary hearing is completed, including arrest warrants.
I wonder if any of the autopsy findings will be released in the preliminary hearing or not…what do you think?
JMO.