arielilane
Justice for Liz Barraza
Surprised to see your post but understand it. I am not worried. It really doesn’t matter what my thoughts are as I sit here posting away with no knowledge of narcissistic personality disorder. It only matters what the jury decides and CO law, and I am confident as to the totality of the circumstances shown throughout the trial (still 4 weeks left of trial) and common sense tell you that the defendant in my opinion will be found guilty as charged as noted by the State.And this is what matters, in the end, in this trial.
LS has admitted she killed Gannon through her plea. She did it but is not guilty by reason of insanity. So all the details of carpet, carpet cutters, guns, etc, is not what is at stake (and I don't think that's what the Judge will instruct the jury to consider).
The entire matter is that she is **crazy**/insane. To be determined by a jury. The facts presented the the prosecution definitely point the jury in strong direction of Guilty.
But they have to also find her Sane. When looked at the way you explained it, she certainly looks out of touch with reality (insane). We need to be prepared for one juror to think the same way. Or to consider the presented facts as evidence of an Insane Woman.
I think we're all trying to come to terms with this. She sure does sound crazy.
I am hoping that once the trial turns to her elaborate (and rational) attempts to cover up what she did (evidence of guilty mind) we will all be able to relax. I cannot bring myself around to believing that she was "insane" in the legal sense.
IMO
In addition, DID defendant is not, but again what do I know? This is all a matter of opinion. Defendant’s actions clearly show she knows right from wrong. Additionally, O/T, the James Holmes case is an interesting read.