In response to the drug/cartel/gang angle some of you are making, it has really made me start to think. I remember a while back, there was a "scare" in my far suburban area that gangs were initiating new members by forcing them to commit a random murder. Supposedly, they were targeting suburban folks, completely innocent and for NO REASON other than to prove their loyalty to the gangs. Now, I don't remember that ever actually transpiring, but...
Now that I see there may very well be 2 perps, could this be part of a larger situation going on. Perhaps this may be a way of sending some kind of message to others in their group or in rival groups, perhaps to prove loyalty and/or a threat.
So I am beginning to wonder if perhaps we aren't looking for "an evil sick monster" that gets their kicks from this activity, but rather those who are doing this for "business related reasons." Ther reason why I am saying this is because IF these are all related, I would see a single perp to be getting their kicks off of doing this in broad daylight, crowded parking lots, etc...but if you look at the context of it being more than one perp....well....it almost sounds kind of like a "dare."
Someone posted about another gal, I think from OK who was tortured, murdered and dismembered in connection with gang activity - to send a message to other women forced to watch.
Count me as one who also discounts any gang or cartel activity here. The girl in the OK case knew and hung around the bangers. This angle is brought up in many cases. It has virtually never been proven to be true in any of the missing/murdered young women/children cases we have examined when the victim had no connection to gangs.
Gang or cartel crimes do not fit the profile at all, IMO of what is happening here. :twocents:
OK, now DH watched the video and he doesn't think it is a Bonneville.
But we just saw the interview with the victim, and I LOVE her!!
Can you post it?
How soon will they make an arrest? Predictions? Are they close?
I think they could be very close. Days or a few weeks.
You know I was thinking about LE saying "there is a predator on the loose". There are always multiple predators on the loose, some due to prison release, some not yet caught for their crimes, etc...in this case they happen to have an active predator on the loose. It takes a horrible crime like Jessica's murder to realize how many predators there are out there. Every time there is a new case, people are shocked by the number of violent sex offenders living nearby the victim. And yet sadly, it is simply a fact of life, until a hideous crime happens. Otherwise, no one really acknowledges all of the dangerous predators walking the streets.
Yes. That is very true. There are always multiple predators on the loose. But right now, there is an active predator on the loose. Sometimes these creeps have long periods of inactivity. This one seems to be in the midst of activity.
No offense but I find the drug cartel/gang-related theory laughable. Gangs are profit motivated. Do they abduct, murder and dismember? Yes, but they don't abduct murder and dismember random 10 year old girls who are walking to school.
I also don't understand why so many here are so invested in thinking this guy is hispanic, especially when he has been described from the beginning as WHITE. It's actually starting to get offensive.
Well, as seen above, I too discount any gang connection. However, to be fair, in the jogging case, the assailant is described as "light skinned".
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingn...nitive-link-between-between-may-abduction-try
That is not a description usually used for white people.
Second, the video surveillance case, in which the two guys attempt an abduction and use a rag, like the rag used in the jogging case, the main assailant is described as "possibly Hispanic".
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...kidnapping-outside-bar-investigated-in-aurora
Since that case is similar to the jogging case in odd method used, and the jogging case is linked to Jessica's, I understand why people are mentioning the possibility that the perp is Hispanic and I do not find it offensive.
I think that
1) any newspaper that reports things that they have been told not to print because it will affect an investigation should be charged. That is different than say, not reporting something because it could embarass someone or ruin a career.
2) If the PD can figure out who the leak is they should be fired! Immediately! Apparently their "moment in the sun" of giving insider info is more important than justice or the investigation. That type of person has no business being in law enforcement. (best comparison I can think of is a stock trader. They have freedom of speech, as do we all, but they will be fired and prosecuted if they give insider information about stocks to others).
3)We as a country should NOT accept this behavior from the media. Not only is it destructive and unethical, (IMO) it will lead us to a place where the media will print whatever it can (true or not) just to beat the competition. Every media outlet will then be at the level of the "rag mags" that are not allowed to be quoted her.
All JMO of course.
I hear ya'. But there have been cases where media revelations solved a case. Like Elizabeth Smart's case. LE scoffed at the Brian Mitchell connection. And they told the family they would not release the sketch or the info about the suspect. The family did so anyhow with the help of the media and the perp was caught.
Also, on the other side of the coin, I have heard many stories of media holding back reporting certain things when asked to by LE in order to find a child or stop a killer. Many do have some ethics, especially when kids are involved.
Just because someone might be a gang member, it does not mean he couldn't also be a sick twisted serial killer.
I know quite a bit about violent gangs. I used to work in South Central and there were a dozen violent local gangs working the area. Saying someone is a 'gang member' is like saying someone is a biker or a Lutheran or a red-head. It does not mean you are 'that' and only that. You can be a member of the V-13s, and wear those black dickie shorts, white t-shirts and tall white socks, and sell crack on your stoop. AND STILL, you might personally take a liking to raping and killing as a hobby.
So I don't think it is laughable at all. When I watched the video I thought the guy was dressed exactly like the bangers I have seen for decades. Dickies and white elastic socks are their preferred uniform.
Wait. You could see the brand of his clothes and the type of socks the perp was wearing in that grainy video? I mean, I can tell he has dark shorts on and a light shirt and possibly, light shoes. That's it. Same thing millions of men wear every day.
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...kidnapping-outside-bar-investigated-in-aurora
Some parents don't have much choice.
Ironically, the less money one makes, the less flexibility the job usually has. I'd think that in compensation for not good compensation things like flex time would be offered but typically not.
I'm sure there are parents in the Denver area who just don't have a choice and agonise every day over it.
Awww. You are so right and that hurt my heart thinking about it.