MerryB
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2014
- Messages
- 1,423
- Reaction score
- 11,791
Which child was allergic to peanuts? This is confusing. Thanks for all your help, btw.
No peanut allergy. Peanuts are legumes. CeCe was allergic to tree nuts.
Which child was allergic to peanuts? This is confusing. Thanks for all your help, btw.
Yes, this is what is commonly done but we have nothing to go on that supports the theory in an organized fashion that supports CW's story. If someone could do that it would be very helpful.
Haaaa, I wish. Atleast then this theory that SW did it, would be based on something legitimate.
THIS! Is actual ORGANIZED evidence rather than gossip and conjecture taken from SW posts. MOO MOO MOO
I guess it depends on how severe the allergy is. What were the allergic reactions these children had? I had not even heard any mention of this, only the treenut allergies.yes, lotsa people are allergic to animals but when that allergy could trigger asthma attacks in a child, responsible parents re-home the pet. It's just common sense. JMO
yes, lotsa people are allergic to animals but when that allergy could trigger asthma attacks in a child, responsible parents re-home the pet. It's just common sense. JMO
That’s absolutely plausible and logical. It is my personal opinion that a fight precipitated these murders.I can’t help but think that what the affidavit is telling us with the huge gap in coverage is that there was a fight, as in yelling and screaming; the kind that so very much upsets little children. But a lot of shouting mean things. And pacing back and forth following each other around to make one more argument. I can’t say snapped but at some point he lashed out in a fatal way. I think “ultimately” follows that part of the story.
I can’t help but think that what the affidavit is telling us with the huge gap in coverage is that there was a fight, as in yelling and screaming; the kind that so very much upsets little children. But a lot of shouting mean things. And pacing back and forth following each other around to make one more argument. I can’t say snapped but at some point he lashed out in a fatal way. I think “ultimately” follows that part of the story.
IMO, it's because that and other things make SW appear to be flaky.
IMO, she was flaky. Flaky, social climber, flighty, putting on the dog, financially foolish, thoughtless to the kids in some videos. MOO and not meant harshly, she was young and had been ill. I cringe at my foolish past and thank goodness it was long ago before SM. I'm almost to cry from embarrassment thinking of some of my youthful nonsense uncomfortably similar to hers.
But all of that does NOT add up to me that she would kill her kids even if faced with the tumbling down of her embellished world if CW wanted out. I could see her jumping on him with both feet, but not going after the kids.
So while I think she was flawed as we all are (I am SO flaky), I do not think any of the known facts about her or the unflattering opinions of her indicate that she'd flip out ON THE KIDS. Therefore, HE did it. MY TWO CENTS. And now I'm running off for awhile in fear!
I don't know. I am very awestruck with this entire summary by gitana, but, for example, not all bullet points are true evidence to me. For example the first.
Edit: Rephrasing - For me this evidence doesn't 100% tell me that CW murdered all three. Unfortunately.
Another edit: No, I just cannot really describe what I mean. I do think he is guilty. Especially after reading this summary again. But I do think there is something we don't know about. Why? I don't know.
Gosh, I am even not sure why I seem to defend CW, never in a million years would I have thought doing this when I joined this thread. But I am just not a person that believes things easily. This case isn't clear-cut at all. IMO.
That’s absolutely plausible and logical. It is my personal opinion that a fight precipitated these murders.
No, of course not. We are just asking if someone could break it down but in an organized way to help others understand. I would be happy with anything anyone could come up with. It doesn't have to be long or in any particular format. Just something that makes sense.Respectfully speaking, everyone has the right to post their opinion on this thread and it doesn't need to be posted in the way that you are asking. JMO
I'm totally confused on the relevance of her taking the kids to a chiropractor. Can someone help me understand why it keeps coming up? TIA.![]()
Thanks for the answer, I had no idea people who see chiropractors are considered flaky.
I'll be sure to warn my friends.![]()
Oh, I see. Thank you for enlightening me. Isn't it pretty strange that she would be able to get away with posting this "abuse" all over her social media for years and no one close to her said anything about it until after she was murdered and unable to speak for herself? MOO.
NO.. he ALWAYS did housework.Do you mean that he always wanted to leave her?
You could really make a case either way. If you believe this was premeditated, there are things that support this view. The same goes with a spur of the moment rage killing. There’s just not a lot to work with by way of evidence.The thing that sent me off on the " no-fight" scenario , in the early days of the threads was the lack of LE evidence of that in the affad and LE waiting til 7 am the next day to do the official missing launch but it could have taken me down the wrong path
Why would a chicken be processed in a factory that processes nuts. And how would SW know that?