gitana1
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- May 31, 2005
- Messages
- 29,391
- Reaction score
- 230,089
I did not say it did.
The investigative report isn't covered by HIPAA in a criminal case either.
I did not say it did.
Exactly. If I was innocent I rather prove it to 1 person that has all of the evidence rather than 12 people that are not privy to my point. JmoMaybe. Depending on who you are, the facts and who the judge is.
read this, quite informative and not as straight forward as you would think I think that CW cannot waive as he has been charged with class 1 felonies.Question for all lawyers.
Is trial by Judge better than trial by jury when you are totally innocent and dont want any bias simpletons deciding your fate?
Agree.Could I ask our new posters to please quote the post to which they are replying? You just click on the little blue "reply" on the right side of the post. Then, type your comment underneath it.
Otherwise when reading through the threads, it's hard to know to
what they are responding. I saw a lot of "I agree!" and other comments
but didn't know the reference.
I wish that there were a way to see more of the post stack and not just
the last post on the subject. It is cumbersome to go back and keep clicking and scrolling to find the whole conversation.
Also it's been hard for me to know what post of mine someone likes, what specific post has been deleted by what mod, and whether I"ve been banned.
Please let me know if you have learned something to update or correct on the Watts floorplan. I think it would be helpful to have an accurate
floorplan with the proper designations of the girls' bedrooms, SW's office, etc.
@Colorado303 is helping me with this task.
Thanks, everybody!
You are correct. I think it's dangerous territory to blame SW because many people do not or will not believe that she killed her precious daughters.But that doesn't necessarily mean they have to prove that SW did it. In the CA case, defense did NOT try to prove that GA molested CA or that Caylee died accidentally in the pool-they just had to plant those seeds. Likewise, defense doesn't have to prove that SW did it, just introduce enough reasonable doubt to make jurors believe that CW may NOT have done it.
I couldn’t find a similar one in Colorado - other states have different statutes (and standards for releasing vs withholding) so it’s apples to oranges...I did. Cited above.
Yes. As long as your edit doesn’t change the meaning of what is being said.Can I ask longtime posters, is it allowed to snip another poster's quote
for brevity if you just want to respond to a couple of their sentences?
Would we just type - "snipped by The Saint for brevity?"
Hi mtnlites!Defense doesn't have to prove that she did it, they only have to prove that he did not.
But it only takes one juror to hang a trial. That juror could be an out-of-state transplant to CO.That is very interesting. I live in Montana, moved to the East coast for several years, folks there are different. It was like wearing new shoes that never really fit well. I came back home, and it was like comfy boots.
People who live in the East, West coast, are more liberal, in general, and probably more open to more ideas or stories. Here, it is, "does that make sense?" Yep. Nope. Trial over.
Haha, so true!He’s a total failure. Barely a day of freedom. If he thought SW was bossy, you have to wonder what he thinks of the prison guards.
Thanks. I think this could help cut down the number of pages.Yes. As long as your edit doesn’t change the meaning of what is being said.
I believe SBM or RSBM has been used for quite a while here...(snipped by me; respectfully snipped by me).Can I ask longtime posters, is it allowed to snip another poster's quote
for brevity if you just want to respond to a couple of their sentences?
Would we just type - "snipped by The Saint for brevity?"
So, it was either a delaying tactic by CW to have LE and NUA wait for him to get back to the house. And/or, CW didn't want to go back and forth through that door when he carried the bodies out because the keypad could have kept track of his movements and time-stamp his going through the inner garage door.I don't think it was broken or disabled for the reason you stated. I do think the reference to CW's statement to LE that it wasn't working has significance, because of the fact that it is even mentioned in the affidavit. My thoughts are LE did check it and it was working.
JMO.
It’s possible there’s something in it they didn’t expect, or don’t fully understand and need to figure out...?
I know she is not on trial. We were discussing how the defense might present their case. They would have to offer solid reasons why she could have done this.
The garage would have provided more concealment.So, it was either a delaying tactic by CW to have LE and NUA wait for him to get back to the house. And/or, CW didn't want to go back and forth through that door when he carried the bodies out because the keypad could have kept track of his movements and time-stamp his going through the inner garage door.
I believe our conversations actually help the prosecution by bringing up possible scenarios that the defense might use. We are aJMO, this is where things get very murky here, because SW is a victim, and she's not been charged with any crime, but she is very much on trial.
I think CW is guilty of all charges and that is based on everything I've seen. I'm not about to help his defense team arrive at how they should present this case so they can win.