moo
here is where we are
with tos
any claim we make must be supported by a confirmed MSM link
so
any post that starts with or in the middle or at the end that states as fact
any of the following
as he was strangling his kids
before he strangled his kids
when he was strangling his kids
is speculation
it is in ones opinion
but for some reason on this tragedy it goes on and on
what we know
he strangled his wife per him
he moved all three
per officials
and his released confession
that is what we know
anyone is presumed innocent until found guilty by a court of law
so we cannot be on here
saying he did he killed three people
he has not been proven in a court of law of that
however
there has been no LE confirming he confessed to murdering everyone
he confessed to murdering his wife and transporting three
anything else posted here
needs to imo have the same qualifiers like on any other thread
that clearly outlines it is our speculation
for some reason the thread has gone on with declarative statements that are only speculation
without the qualifier that it is only that - it is one's opinion and speculation
why that is
i do not understand
we have no confirmation per official sources that he say she killed two kids
what can i say
all i think per tos
is anyone stating that is offering speculation
declares that
like on any case that needs to be outlined as speculation only
all I am suggesting here
as any other thread
anything posted
not confirmed
moo
Don’t you think it’s odd that all three victims died in the same manner, when, according to CW there were two different murderers?
I digested his “defense” — I imagined in my own mind what I’d do if I saw my spouse strangling my kids, and I decided that I probably wouldn’t also strangle her in an attempt to get her to stop.
Theoretically, if you see someone doing something really bad to someone else, the last thing you’d do is just strangle them.
What I mean by this is: If I saw my spouse strangling my kids, I’d pick up the nearest and heaviest object (or find a weapon such as a knife or a gun) and come up from behind and beat the hell out of them with it, or stab them, or whatever— anything to make them stop killing my kids.
He didn’t say or seemingly do anything like this. And to me, it doesn’t make sense. Why did he say he flew into a rage and strangled her too? What would make more sense to me is if he said: I flew into a rage, grabbed a knife stabbed her with it, or just beat the hell out of her for trying to kill my kids. Why would he just attempt hand to hand combat was someone who is killing his kids? That makes no sense to me.
Also, they all died the same, in the same manner. Which usually leads someone to believe it was only one murderer who killed everyone in the same way.
Also, say he is telling the truth: why didn’t he just call the police? Why did he give an interview and act like he didn’t know what happened if he was really the victim and was trying to stop his wife from killing his kids? That’s not what innocent people do. If he’s telling the truth, why did he wrap up his families bodies and throw his daughters in a vat of crude oil? ...I’m thinking he would’ve thrown her in there too, but he couldn’t get her up the stairs— And that’s what the shallow grave was for. Maybe he was going to come back and put her in there later.
I’m not so sure why it’s out of the realm of possibilities that he is lying? It makes more sense that he killed his family rather than the story that he has created. Because his story doesn’t make logical sense for many of the reasons I have described.
