I understand what you are saying. I'd like to know the exact wording also.This is impossible for us to interpret without seeing the actual lab report. The specific words used in the report mean things.
As many have said, we all partially match to somebody.
Is this a partial match to a partial profile or a partial profile and a complete match? It matters to the statistics and of course the prosecution.
I am convinced BM did this but I would look at this differently if they had a complete match on a partial profile where the statistics were getting pretty high.
When I try to wrap my head around a random stranger doing this, I ask why was a random stranger in her glove box? This person would have been in the house then because surely he didn't somehow get in her car and leave no DNA anywhere except the glove box. Then the house wasn't messed up, no sign of a struggle there (expect the door jam of the master bedroom).. How would she have been abducted from her house (for dna of a stranger to be in the glove box he had to be in the house or the very least in the garage where her car was) and why would this same stranger throw her bike down where it was and her helmet where it was?
Why would Suzanne's phone ping at 4:23am that Mother's Day morning and never again? Barry says he was home then and she was sleeping. She woke up on Mother's Day and didn't check her phone for messages from her girls or for texts from Sheila whose daughter was getting married that day? If she did get up and go on a bike ride, why didn't she use her phone at all before that? Where is her phone? Did the random stranger take her from the bike ride then go back to her house and only get in the glove box? Didn't steal her purse right there in the car? Why didn't she take her camelback for this bike ride?
The scene doesn't really fit a stranger attack/abduction/murder. If this other DNA was on the doors of the house, if the house was messed up like this person was looking for things, if a bike ride wasn't staged, etc.