One thing that strikes me about the defense’s line of questioning is just how sloppily (vaguely) they are wording their technical inquiries. Messages, email’s, texts, SMS, IM’s, PM’s, etc., all have slightly different connotations that matter. The same for location services, WiFi, gps, and cellular, etc. The same again for EVD (electronic vehicle data) discussions.
IMO, the respondents are (rightfully) taking liberties with their abbreviated answers to the defense in order to protect just how much they really do know — saving it for trial.
I’m seeing holes in the questions and that the answers supplied are taking advantage of them.
Works for me. Don’t answer what you weren’t asked. Don’t share what you don’t have to.
But the trial may come down to which team has the best tech skills. Which can best translate that tech-speak into lay-language And if a jury that “gets it” is seated.
MOO.