I wanted to address a few things that have been mentioned, and I'm too lazy to go back and multi-quote, so please forgive me if my post bounces around a lot.
I. I'm sure a resident attorney will correct me if I remember this wrong, I believe that libel is when you: 1. write something untrue about another person. 2. You know it's untrue at the time. 3. It causes damage to the person's occupation/income source. The three biggest defenses aer that 1. It's true. 2. You have reasonable explanations for why you believe it's true. 3. It doesn't affect the person financially. I don't know if any of what's on the blog or the people it's about would pass the test. I do think that it might be possible for them to send a C&D letter, but I'm not real sure about how they'd work in these circumstances.
II. It's not really that hard to walk without making noise - even on a roof (I just wish some people who live in apartments would teach their kids how!). Hearing footsteps bothered me so much when I was young that I got to the point where I could walk in 3 inch heels on any kind of pavement, walk through dried leaves, run on any kind of surface if barefoot and never make a sound. I am surprised that someone on "hyper-alert" wouldn't here an occational step, creak, etc., but with the attic between the roof and the ceilings, background noises most people have in their homes, and a conscious effort by the person to step quietly, I don't think it would be that obvious to most people.
III. Video games may not teach kids exactly how to do things, but they can give them a general idea. For instance (not saying this is or isn't the case here), a 'peeping tom' wants to watch a girl/woman who has drapes covering all windows except those up near the ceiling. It might not teach them how to climb on the roof, go over to the window, lean over the edge with a mirror on a pole and watch - but it could lay out that outline for him to follow. I'm not suggesting that video games turn kids/people into criminals, but they could help unimaginative [potential] criminals to come up with plans for their crimes.
IV. I don't remember who mentioned it, but I remember reading it. I believe someone asked about quoting the blog if we aren't allowed to recopy the pictures. The rules of this thread do say that we weren't allowed to 'copy' anything from the blog here, it had to be paraphrased.
V. To me it doesn't really matter who the figure in the picture was, it showed that there was someone there.
VI. No offense intended to anyone here, but I'm sure somebody will feel offended by this. It sometimes bothers me to read that M and/or TI had to be imagining or making things up because ther's no proof that it happened. They then turn around and say that what most likely happened is <...> and say something that there is not only no evidence for, but wouldn't even fit with the little evidence there is.
Lucky for you, by the time I got caught up with my reading, I forgot most of the points I wanted to mention.