Coronavirus COVID-19 - Global Health Pandemic #70

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
You make a lot of good points and I apologise if I engaged in improper debate. On the bright side, I think this drug dexamethasone is going to make a real difference to those with severe cases of COVID. And it's pennies a pill!

No improper debate imo. :)

It is good to know how the covid financial assistance works. After all, we will all have to bear the brunt of these loans for many years to come.

My country is going to try to stabilise (end it, in areas where it can) the covid assistance by the end of September - if that is humanly possible.
 
Last edited:
You make a lot of good points and I apologise if I engaged in improper debate. On the bright side, I think this drug dexamethasone is going to make a real difference to those with severe cases of COVID. And it's pennies a pill!

As far as I know from the studies *so far*, dex has the best record on bringing people back from the ventilator, if used at the right time.

For vaccines, my fingers are crossed for Oxford or Moderna ...
 
And maybe warming your face, if you're in winter like it is where I am.
Looked at the weather before I went out last week and it was 2.6 degrees at 9.30 am.
I haven't worn a mask yet. It seems impossible to buy them and I'm not crafty. Seems our state. NSW, maybe in for some mask wearing in our future so I should look into getting some.
I have about 20 from Bunnings but they were ones we bought when we were going to repair some bricks on the side wall and they are very thin and just one layer of what feels like very thin cardboard, no pocket for a filtter.

Chemist Warehouse had some when I looked online the other day, most were Click and Collect and we don't have a store here.


I like that the well-made cloth ones are also giving my face some extra sun protection when it’s 98 degrees out.
 
That's great you can get such quick tests. I am wondering how common it is to receive several tests. As that could inflate the test numbers. Hope your tests are all negative and continue to be so.

All of our tests have been negative. I’m actually currently sitting at urgent care with my youngest waiting on yet another rapid test result which I am sure will also be negative. Alas, if you come to urgent care with any symptom of covid (and let’s face it, that’s pretty much any symptom you can think of), you get swabbed. Sigh.

So the only thing we might be over-inflating would be the number of negative test results. I’ve heard they have some sort of system not to double count the positives but I have doubts as to how accurate that might be. They did stop counting rapid test results which is dumb IMO because nobody with a positive rapid test is also wasting their time on a PCR test unless they end up in the hospital. So, if anything, the number of positives should be far higher.
 
Rsbm
We will even be fined, if Police see us driving, without masks on.

Coronavirus in Victoria is a 'numbers rollercoaster'. This is the current state of play in the COVID-19 crisis

Coronavirus in Victoria is a 'numbers rollercoaster'. This is the current state of play in the COVID-19 crisis

Rachel Clayton

2 hrs ago
...
Mandatory masks could be here 'for a very long time'
From Thursday, wearing a face covering will be mandatory when outdoors in metropolitan Melbourne and the Mitchell Shire.

The Government argues it's a low-cost, high-reward tactic to help stop the virus's spread.

And Victorians have been warned they will need to get used to it.

"We are going to be wearing masks in Victoria, and potentially in other parts of the country, for a very long time," Premier Daniel Andrews said.
Even if there’s nobody else in the car?
 

“During the initial outbreak, doctors and nurses were hailed as heroes in the fight against COVID-19. Some say they now feel more like cannon fodder in a war that has become increasingly divisive.

“People continue to regard the virus as a political scheme or conspiracy theory. People continue to ignore recommended guidelines on how to help slow the virus’ spread. People continue to complain about wearing a mask. We’ve got to do better as a community,” Dowell, the Mississippi doctor, wrote in a Facebook message released by South Sunflower County hospital.”

[...]

“He said it is disheartening to see a widespread disregard for safety measures and worries about Alabama's future at a time when the virus is posing more of a threat than ever.

“I’m just thinking, `Oh, my goodness. We’re going to be in trouble very soon,‘” Saag said.”
 
“During the initial outbreak, doctors and nurses were hailed as heroes in the fight against COVID-19. Some say they now feel more like cannon fodder in a war that has become increasingly divisive.

“People continue to regard the virus as a political scheme or conspiracy theory. People continue to ignore recommended guidelines on how to help slow the virus’ spread. People continue to complain about wearing a mask. We’ve got to do better as a community,” Dowell, the Mississippi doctor, wrote in a Facebook message released by South Sunflower County hospital.”

[...]

“He said it is disheartening to see a widespread disregard for safety measures and worries about Alabama's future at a time when the virus is posing more of a threat than ever.

“I’m just thinking, `Oh, my goodness. We’re going to be in trouble very soon,‘” Saag said.”

I read that post...heartbreaking to know what physicians, nurses, techs etc are up against. He and his wife are in a particularly part of the state which is being hit hard. Actually, it is becoming bad in Mississippi like in many other states yet our governor has mandated masks in only 13 counties.
 
WAITING ON TEST RESULTS - Well, I have an update to report . . . as I've mentioned before I work in a large church office. One of our members is a doctor with a busy GP practice. He spoke with our pastor today and said that the entire staff could meet in his parking lot tomorrow morning at 8am to be tested AND we would have results in 15 minutes!

Now I may still test positive and I will still be anxious (probably even more so) but at least I'll have something definite to be anxious about, lol.

It's funny but I have type A positive blood (unfortunately) and because I always expect the worst, DH says "A positive? No, you're definitely B negative".

Imo, the jury is still out on the blood type relation. I’ve seen reports go both ways:

Harvard / July 17:

“”This evidence should help put to rest previous reports of a possible association between blood type A and a higher risk for COVID-19 infection and mortality,” Dua said.”

COVID and Blood Type

eta: I see @slowpoke posted the same thing:
Crossing fingers for you, Rose! I’ve got a long wait, yet. Lucky you.

Regarding blood type, a new Harvard study says:

“Blood type is not associated with a severe worsening of symptoms in people who have tested positive for COVID-19, report Harvard Medical School researchers based at Massachusetts General Hospital.”

“This evidence should help put to rest previous reports of a possible association between blood type A and a higher risk for COVID-19 infection and mortality,” Dua said.”

I hope they’re right. I have type A, too.

COVID and Blood Type

—-

Your blood type might not matter at all for COVID-19 risk, new studies suggest

—-

Blood types and coronavirus: Are certain types more vulnerable to Covid-19? - CNN

—-

Re: test,

I wonder if it’s similar to this?

Breakthrough: New Blood Test Detects Positive COVID-19 Result in 20 minutes

There are also saliva tests, and I saw one company from Sweden on the news the other day producing a breath test that detects gases.

Saliva Tests: How They Work and What They Bring to COVID-19

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes First Diagnostic Test Using At-Home Collection of Saliva Specimens

New COVID-19 Saliva Test Is Born in Columbia Fertility Clinic

Pilot Program Offers Free Saliva COVID-19 Testing For Tarrant County Residents

Coronavirus saliva test in Houston located near NRG | khou.com

—-

In South Africa, COVID-19 Breath Test Trial Set for June

Ohio State researchers testing breathalyzer to detect COVID-19

Team to develop Breathalyzer-like diagnostic test for COVID-19

BGU researcher develops one-minute COVID-19 breath test

Breath of Hope: COVID-19 breathalyzer testing in development | Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

—-
FDA:
Coronavirus Testing Basics

What Takes So Long? A Behind-The-Scenes Look At The Steps Involved In COVID-19 Testing
March 30

Answers to common questions about COVID-19 testing | Norton Healthcare Louisville, Ky.
May 19

CDC / Information for Laboratories about Coronavirus (COVID-19)
July 3
 
Last edited:
:eek:

NorCal restaurant refuses to serve customers wearing masks, could face license suspension

PLACERVILLE, Calif. (KABC) -- A restaurant in Northern California is facing complaints after customers say staff has refused to serve anyone wearing a mask.

The Apple Bistro in Placerville, located about 40 miles northeast of Sacramento, has been turning people away if they are wearing a mask, according to multiple reviews posted on Yelp and social media.

The restaurant has a sign posted out front stating its position clearly: "No social conditioning. No oxygen deprivation mask. No latex dirty germ spreader."
...
 
:eek:

NorCal restaurant refuses to serve customers wearing masks, could face license suspension

PLACERVILLE, Calif. (KABC) -- A restaurant in Northern California is facing complaints after customers say staff has refused to serve anyone wearing a mask.

The Apple Bistro in Placerville, located about 40 miles northeast of Sacramento, has been turning people away if they are wearing a mask, according to multiple reviews posted on Yelp and social media.

The restaurant has a sign posted out front stating its position clearly: "No social conditioning. No oxygen deprivation mask. No latex dirty germ spreader."
...
Sounds a bit cuckoo.
 
Ky. Couple On House Arrest After Not Signing Positive Covid-19 Self-Isolation Order

A Hardin County couple is now on house arrest after one of them tested positive for COVID-19 and decided not to sign documents agreeing to self-quarantine.

Last week, Elizabeth Linscott got tested for the COVID-19 because she was planning to visit her parents in Michigan.

“My grandparents wanted to see me, too,” Linscott said. “So just to make sure if they tested negative, that they would be OK, everything would be fine.”

After testing positive but without showing any symptoms, Linscott said the health department contacted her and requested she sign documents that will limit her traveling anywhere unless she calls the health department first. She said she chose to not sign the documents.

“My part was if I have to go to the ER, if I have to go to the hospital, I’m not going to wait to get the approval to go,” she said.

But Linscott said she would take necessary precautions if she needed to go to the hospital, like letting workers know she has recently tested positive for COVID-19.

A couple of days after she denied signing the Self-isolation and Controlled Movement Agreed Order, Linscott said the Hardin County Sheriff’s Department arrived at her home without warning. Her husband, Isaiah, was home.

”I open up the door and there’s like eight different people,” he said. “Five different cars and I’m like what the heck’s going on? This guy’s in a suit with a mask, it’s the health department guy and he has three different papers for us. For me, her and my daughter."

The couple was ordered to wear ankle monitors. If they travel more than 200 feet, law enforcement will be notified.

“We didn’t rob a store, we didn’t steal something, we didn’t hit and run, we didn’t do anything wrong,” Elizabeth Linscott said.

The couple said they never denied self-quarantining, they just didn’t agree with the wording of the documents..

”That’s exactly what the Director of the Public Health Department told the judge, that I was refusing to self-quarantine because of this and that was not the case at all,” Linscott said. “I never said that.”

The Linscotts said they plan to get an attorney.
 
PASCO COUNTY, Fla. (WFLA) – A Pasco County middle school teacher has passed away from complications relating to coronavirus. Now, her family is trying to cope with their tragic loss.

“We’re all stunned,” John Dermott said about the sudden loss of his wife. “I mean she was doing great this morning.”

Renee Dermott was a teacher a sixth grade teacher at Seven Springs Middle School in New Port Richey.

Renee battled complications from coronavirus since July 13 at the Medical Center of Trinity, passing away days before her 52nd birthday.

Pasco Co. middle school teacher dies from COVID-19 complications | WFLA

I’m so concerned about our teachers and what they are facing in just a matter of weeks.
 
I posted an article about this yesterday. Partying like there is no tomorrow, not a mask in sight, no distancing. I expect a second wave in NYC after seeing this but no one has commented on it at all so far.

I don't claim to know the answer, but I am beginning to wonder if the "Swedish Method" might be the best way?
 
Oh I agree - health of the citizens should be the number one priority. No doubt at all. But labelling it a loan or even having the best excuse in the world to print money doesn't change the fact that it generally leads to economic disaster in the long run. Great book on this: "This Time is Different" by Reinhart and Rogoff about ten years ago.

I’m no economist but I do hear the economists and the current government especially is considered the more fiscally conservative party. The economist commentators overall are happy with the packages being doled out during this crisis. These have been strategically aimed at saving the economy, businesses and jobs. We have one of the lowest national debt levels in the developed world, so overall we were in a pretty good place to ride this out to begin with. (We also made it out of the GFC virtually unscathed). So technically we’re in a position to borrow a ton more than what we are (but we won’t).

As a quick comparison our public debt as a % of GDP is 27.5%, USA is 93.6% and UK is 103.7%. (From The global debt clock)

That’s not to say we won’t see some pain to recover from this, of course, that’s pretty much the whole world right now. Govt will want to get back to a better position so no doubt there will be some tax increases and cuts to public spending in our future.
 
When I read about the Russians trying to spy on the vaccine research recently, I thought what a shame it is that vaccine research isn't a collaborative effort of all the best scientists in the world. Humanity was able to build the International Space Station, a scientific collaboration among nearly 20 countries with Russia as a major contributor.

If we could collaborate on that project, how much more effort should we be putting into working together for a vaccine. We should continue working together to decide how it will be distributed to areas of greatest need first, then to all humanity, so that even the poorest countries will have vaccination programs. With all the very best researchers working together, CoVid could be driven from the world.

I promise you there is a spectacular collaboration from scientists all over the world. Don’t worry about this, my friend. Last I heard there are 166ish entities, iirc, There is a strong network of data sharing among scientists and labs globally which has been in place since the beginning and it’s continuously being strengthened and growing. I also promise you that WHO is not only focused laser focused on this global collaboration, but also on equitable distribution, with a prioritized focus on health workers and others who are most vulnerable. This is all part of the ACT Accelerator, COVAX, and it is an amazing collaboration.

April 20 / source

“Dr. Van Kerkhove: (56:23)
Thank you [Derek 00:00:56:23]. The question was about the development of a vaccine and the claim about rapidly producing one in perhaps six months, so we welcome all work on the development of a vaccine and as rapidly and as safely as possible. We welcome this. The question was about whether or not you can develop a vaccine on a virus we don’t yet know, if I understood the question appropriately. There are more than 10,000 full genome sequences that have been made publicly available from all over the world and there are a large number of scientists and virologists who are looking in detail at each full genome sequence that is available and we thank all countries, everyone who has made those sequences available because that allows us to check these viruses and see if the virus is changing.

What we see among these 10,000 viruses, is that it is relatively stable. There are little changes, normal changes in viruses, but nothing that’s unexpected and so the development of a vaccine on viruses that are available is good. There are many vaccine candidates that are in development and we’re working with many partners to accelerate this. As quickly and safely as possible, we welcome this and we welcome not only the development, but the equitable distribution of any vaccine that does become available because we will need a vaccine in the future.”


COVAX, the ACT-Accelerator Vaccines pillar
Insuring accelerated vaccine development and manufacture
Introduction
Developing a vaccine against COVID-19 is the most pressing challenge of our time. The global pandemic has already caused the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives and disrupted the lives of billions more. As well as reducing the tragic loss of life, introduction of a vaccine will prevent the loss $375 B1 to the global economy every month.
Developing one or more safe and effective vaccines is also one of the most complex challenges of our time. Unlike with past vaccine development, scaling up manufacturing and completion of human trials for vaccine candidates must be done in parallel. Even with accelerated investment in manufacturing, and the completion of trials to ensure vaccine candidates are safe and effective, there is no scenario in which supply over the next 18 months will exceed demand although at today’s anticipated trajectory some vaccine candidates could become available within this time frame.
Governments are answerable to their populations and to their taxpayers, and with so many lives and livelihoods at stake some are understandably pursuing bilateral deals with manufacturers to secure access to scarce future vaccine supplies. As treasuries around the world seek to address unprecedented revenue shocks, such strategies bring hope and instill confidence. But they also bring risk. In normal times, vaccine development is long, complicated, and more often than not ends in failure; it is difficult to know which deals will actually result in getting any vaccine.
Many leaders have called for a global solution to address a global issue and for a shared endeavor that involves the best shared science to resolve in the shortest possible time a pandemic involving every region and territory on the planet. The COVAX Pillar provides this solution: through portfolio diversification, pooling of financial and scientific resources, and economies of scale, participating governments and blocs can hedge the risk of backing unsuccessful candidates just as governments with limited or no ability to finance their own bilateral procurement can be assured access to life-saving vaccines that would otherwise have been beyond their reach.
The goal of the COVAX Pillar is to end the acute phase of the global pandemic by the end of 2021. If it succeeds in this goal, through the appropriate allocation of safe and effective doses of vaccines in phases determined by epidemiology and public health to slow and ultimately to stop the pandemic, it could save millions of lives and transform the economic prospects of governments and individuals.
The COVAX Pillar is an urgently needed approach to getting a safe and effective vaccine faster, through financing that shares the risks of development and creates the capacity for manufacturing vaccine doses now, in parallel with clinical development, and before they are shown to work. It will show how participating countries, by buying into a share of many vaccine candidates instead of just a few, will be able to insure themselves against the failure of any individual candidate and secure successful vaccines in a cost-effective, targeted way.
COVAX: The Context
When a successful vaccine is found, worldwide demand will be in the billions of doses to address the epidemiologic needs. But initial supply will inevitably be limited. The current best-case estimate is that no more than a few hundred million doses will be available by December 2020 in the current environment, scaling to a cumulative 2 billion doses by end 2021.
1 IMF estimates, published on April 14 The Great Lockdown: Worst Economic Downturn Since the Great Depression downturn-since-the-great-depression/

It is difficult to predict which vaccine(s) will be successful. Indeed, the vast majority of vaccines in early development fail. The probability of success for a vaccine in early stage development is less than 20% prior to Phase 2 clinical trial.
This means that the best chance of success for any country is to diversify and access a broad portfolio of vaccine candidates. This increases the chances of success and allows the vaccines that are successful to be shared. Such an approach would enable every country to gain access to a much broader array of vaccines than they would otherwise have through multiple bilateral agreements with individual manufacturers. For countries with local development or manufacturing capacity, this ‘portfolio approach’ insures countries against the risk of their own candidates proving unsuccessful or less effective, or that domestic manufacturing capacity is unsuitable, leaving them with no vaccines at all.
Pooling risks not only means a greater chance at shared rewards through access to successful vaccine candidates, it also means lower prices as competition in a non-pooled risks scenario leads to a disorderly market with price gouging as individual buyers seek to outbid each other for limited resources.
Over time, there will be adequate doses available to vaccinate all who need vaccination, assuming a safe and effective vaccine is found, sufficient investment in manufacturing capacity is secured, and adequate market incentives are established for manufacturers. In the meantime, an allocation methodology is required that stratifies and prioritizes risk groups (for example, healthcare workers, elderly, vulnerable groups) for vaccination in such a way to reduce the spread of virus and the impact of the virus on lives, livelihoods, health systems and economies as quickly as possible.
The biggest challenge will be supply of vaccines for the period while supply is scaling up. While massive efforts are underway to establish large production capacity, initial supplies will need to be prioritized. The main allo- cation criteria are based on the most urgent goal of reducing mortality, protecting health systems and policy.
Priority populations will be determined based on the characteristics of the specific vaccine(s) that demonstrate safety and efficacy. Policy recommendations will lay out the priority populations with the first round of vac- cination likely to consider:
- Health care system workers (1% of global population)
- Adults over 65 years old (8% of global population)
- Other high-risk adults with underlying conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, etc. (15%)
COVAX: The ACT-Accelerator Vaccines pillar
The ACT-Accelerator is a global collaboration to accelerate the development, production and equitable access to new COVID-19 diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines. It is a partnership of key stakeholders – political leaders, public and private sector partners, civil society, academia – that leverages each partner’s strengths to drive towards accelerated and equitable access.
Within the ACT-Accelerator, COVAX, the vaccines pillar, is driving the work on vaccine development, manufacturing, procurement and delivery at scale, as well as policy and allocation, bringing it together into the type of agreement described above. It leverages the expertise of existing organisations (CEPI, Gavi and WHO) and industry partners in a new way to meet the challenge of a pandemic.
The COVAX Pillar also ensures that the required additional activities for the successful launch of vaccine are supported in parallel – including detailed demand and supply scenarios, the regulatory dialogue to avoid time lags, the setup of an allocation framework and mechanism and supporting the buildup of infrastructure and health systems preparedness.
A fully financed COVAX pillar could give all participating governments a guaranteed share of any future successful vaccine production.

The COVAX pillar will simultaneously address both pull financing (advance market commitments), and push financing (at-risk investments for R&D, manufacturing capacity reservation & inventory), and agree to do so now to drive investment at high speed, volume, and ‘at risk’, and to secure manufacturing inventory build-up and future supply. By combining the power and expertise of CEPI’s R&D role on the push side with Gavi’s procurement and allocation function on the pull side, the COVAX pillar is able to ensure the manufacturing of doses now, something neither organisation, government or financier could achieve entirely on its own. Supported by the World Health Organization in assuring effective regulation and optimal allocation, both CEPI and Gavi will use the depth and breadth of their partnerships with governments, private sector, academia, civil society, and financiers to achieve the accelerated impact the world needs from the COVAX pillar.
Why we need to act now
1. Mitigate economic damage – for every month that this pandemic continues, $375 billion[1 is lost from
the global economy. Acting now to accelerate development, manufacture, and distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine will save hundreds of thousands of lives and protect the livelihoods of millions more.
2. Accelerate availability of vaccine – if we follow the traditional course of vaccine development, we could face years of delay. Such a delay will cost lives and trillions of dollars in economic damage. CO- VAX will enable at-risk investments in production capacity across several candidates now – to ensure that, upon regulatory approval, doses can be made immediately available at scale.
3. Ensure globally fair allocation and access for low and middle income countries (LMIC) - nobody is safe from COVID-19 until everybody is safe. COVAX not only represents the best solution to end this pandemic, it is also the fairest way to allocate vaccine for all countries to ensure that access can be provided for every country.
The COVID-19 Vaccine Global Access (COVAX) Facility
When sufficiently capitalized, the COVAX pillar will immediately offer advance purchase agreements to vaccine candidates meeting technical threshold criteria. This will be done to produce vaccines at risk before we have results of efficacy trials. Offering between five to ten such contracts will allow a specially created financial instrument, the COVAX Facility, which sits within the pillar, to:
a) procure cumulative 2 billion doses by end 2021, ensuring that participating countries receive allocations of vaccine as quickly as possible including an emergency buffer (10% of doses)
b) procure the highest possible volume of vaccine from each manufacturer, resulting in the greatest number of doses at the most economically efficient price
c) provide for globally fair and equitable allocation of vaccine, saving millions of lives, and protecting millions more livelihoods, and bringing the acute phase of the pandemic to an end in the most efficient fashion possible.
Initial capitalization would provide an equitable distribution of doses and begin to dent the epidemic in participating countries. The COVAX pillar is for all countries. It will include a fair and equitable allocation of limited supplies on the basis of ethical values and public health goals. Criteria will include population groups with higher risk of mortality, burden of disease, threat, vulnerability, product supply and logistics, country context , and global health security priorities. As further scale-up of production occurs, and the market is considered orderly, countries will have continued allocation of doses as needed, or could revert to bilateral deals where that makes sense for them to do so.
COVAX in numbers
[1IMF estimates, published on April 14https://blogs.imf.org/2020/04/14/the-great-lockdown-worst-economic- downturn-since-the-great-depression/.

Ending the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic as soon as possible will require large up-front capital. Com- mitments from high income and upper middle income countries (HIC, UMIC), are needed (1) to procure ~950 M doses through the COVAX Facility; and (2) to ensure that vaccine can be delivered at the greatest possible speed by underwriting the costs of manufacturing at risk are needed.. $18.1 B is needed to cover these latter costs as well as the costs of procuring and delivering vaccine for low and middle income countries
(LMIC). Such investment will secure the development of, and fair access to, up to two billion doses of vaccine by the end of 2021, assuming a safe and effective vaccine is developed in the near future. Of this total, $11.3 B is needed urgently to cover investments within the next 6 months. This includes ~$2 B in funding for advance market commitments to secure doses for LMICs. It also accounts for an emergency buffer of doses with mixed funding sources.
These numbers are estimates and will become more precise once we get a better idea of, among other factors, the technology that the successful vaccine candidates will be based on, and the number of doses required.
The total funding need of $18.1 B for 2020/2021 is made up of:
- Research & development and manufacturing: Investment in R&D of $2.4 B ($1.5 B urgent need), tech transfer/scale-up and out of $1.7 B ($1.2 B urgent need), at-risk manufacturing of $5.3 B ($5.2 B ur- gent need) are required. ~$4.3 B from at-risk manufacturing is expected to be recovered as inventory value for successful candidates.
- Volume guarantees/procurement: Significant amounts of capital will be required for manufacturer- specific and market-wide volume guarantees and advance procurement for countries of all income levels, including $5.5 B ($2.0 B urgent need for AMC) for immunizing for example healthcare workers and high risk population of LMICs through the Gavi Advance Market Commitment (AMC) and securing an emergency vaccine stockpile of ~200 M doses. In addition, a commitment from HIC and UMIC to procure ~950 M doses through the COVAX Facility is needed. The final cost will depend on the even- tual vaccines that are developed. Payments will only be made once candidates reach licensure or an equivalent regulatory milestone (e.g., recommendation of use). It is necessary to have funding and guarantees in place to protect volumes and encourage manufacturers to scale up and enter multilat- eral deals with the COVAX Facility.
- Delivery costs: ~$3.2 B ($1.4 B urgent need) are needed for in-country delivery to build up supply chain capacity and carry out vaccine campaigns in LIC and LMIC as well as for global coordination and technical assistance. Delivery for UMIC and HIC is expected to be covered by domestic health budgets.
Against the human costs of the pandemic, and the estimated $375 B[1 impact on the global economy every month we delay, the imperative to act now, and to act together, and to act boldly, is clear.
[1IMF estimates, published on April 14https://blogs.imf.org/2020/04/14/the-great-lockdown-worst-economic- downturn-since-the-great-depression/.

Dr. Michael Ryan: (13:46)
Good afternoon. We all hope, as you do, that we can reach a point where a safe and effective vaccine is developed and allocated fairly to countries around the world. As the Director-General has said in his speech, we don’t have that vaccine yet. And there’s a lot we can do now to suppress transmission. And I believe the Republic of Georgia has been doing well in this regard, both in terms of community engagement, in terms of suppression of transmission, and saving lives through adequate clinical care. But yes, we do hope that a vaccine will be developed. There have been over 133 candidates put into the system. A large number are now in clinical trials. The Director-General launched the ACT Accelerator in April as a means of leveraging global collaboration and innovation and funding, both for vaccines, drugs, and for diagnostics. The vaccines is probably the one that will absorb most resources and requires a very deep sustained public-private partnership.

It is the best means for countries to access the vaccine. And we have to find a way to ensure that regional alliances that are growing to develop contracts with companies for vaccines are linked to a global movement that ensures that those vaccines are made available to all countries. The GAVI, SEPI, and WHO are working together on Covax, the initiative for coronavirus vaccines, as part of that large advanced market commitments that are being put together in order to secure vaccine production.

There is no other means of achieving adequate herd immunity. The herd immunity is a term usually reserved for the use of vaccines. But we also have to be cautious and careful. We desperately hope, and we can see tremendous work towards, safe and effective vaccines. But there are no guarantees of such. And therefore, that’s why we have so many candidates in testing, so we have an opportunity to find the best one. But the only other way that a virus like this may be suppressed is by us breaking the chains of transmission. If you accept that you cannot do that, then the only option is to let this virus run free through society. And we have already seen the horrific impacts of that. And therefore, reducing mortality, suppressing transmission, while waiting for the arrival of a safe and effective vaccine right now is our best strategy for stopping this disease.


Dr. Tedros: (16:35)
Thank you. I just would like to … What my general said, Mike, herd immunity is very difficult even when we have vaccines because we need to have a high coverage of vaccine use to have herd immunity.

Dr. Tedros: (17:03)
… vaccine use to have herd immunity, and Mike had already said it.

July 1 Who Briefing / transcript /
Press briefings

Jim Roope: (20:46)
“Yes, thank you very much and hello everyone. I apologize for not having a question about the Mediterranean thing, but I do have a question about, as I understand it, there is no vaccine for a coronavirus, and this is the first coronavirus pandemic. So my question is, if there is a vaccine that is developed successfully for this coronavirus, and I’m assuming there will be. Will that help in developing a universal vaccine for the coronavirus, or just a universal vaccine in general? Would this be a great step toward that?

Dr. Michael Ryan: (21:34)
Universal vaccines against respiratory pathogens are really the holy grail of our longterm hopes. We’ve spent many decades thinking and hoping for a universal vaccine against influenza, and that has not been achieved. Although, much work is currently underway to develop such a universal vaccine, and that work is funded by many agencies around the world, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. So, identifying the targets in viruses that are conserved over time, in other words, sequences or proteins that we can develop vaccines against, that allow us to give a universal protection, are very important.

It remains to be seen whether a vaccine against this coronavirus would provide any cross protection against other coronaviruses. Many of the vaccines being developed are being developed against the surface proteins of the virus. There is a constant variation in those proteins, and therefore we would hope that the vaccines that are developed will be effective against this strain of the virus. It remains to be seen whether that would provide any cross protection. And I would imagine, given the longterm threat presented by coronaviruses and what we see out there in nature, that the longterm pursuit of more universal vaccines against [Sarah’s 00:23:00] coronaviruses should be a longterm objective in the vaccine development community.

But for now, we deal with SARS-CoV-2, and what we do need is a safe and effective vaccine against this virus. And as you know, many, many products are currently in the pipeline, many now in clinical trials. We hope that such vaccines will be number one, effective. Number two, safe, and number three, will be accepted by people around the world and be available for everyone who needs them. And those outcomes are not a given, and we have a lot of hard work to do in order to be able to achieve that. But yes, the pursuit of universal vaccines is a very positive idea, but as I said, it’s easy to say, it’s hard to do. We’re many decades into influenza control, and we’re still not close to having universal vaccines against that virus.

Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove: (23:54)
Thanks Mike. Just to add, to say that I think this is a very good question, and it’s a good opportunity to say that the work on vaccines for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, began even before January, 2020 with the development of vaccines for SARS-CoV-1 and for MERS. And so, the work that began there was building the research capacity, building the techniques and the technologies that could be used to advance vaccine development as a whole. And so, in January, 2020, we didn’t start from scratch. We had a new virus, we had a new pathogen, and being able to know what that is triggered our work into focusing on SARS-CoV-2, as Mike has just said.

But the collaborations that began with scientists all over the world, with manufacturers, with production companies. That started before, and now we’ve enhanced that, and now we’ve accelerated that. Working towards a vaccine that is safe, that is effective, and that is available for those who need it. But I think we should pay homage to the people who have been working on coronaviruses for decades. There are a number of coronaviruses that circulate. And so, those that did the hard work for SARS-CoV-1, those that are doing the work for MERS, because MERS is still circulating in the Eastern Mediterranean region, and other countries as well. Any advancement we could make for a coronavirus vaccine, will get us closer to a vaccine for any coronavirus that emerges. Hopefully this work will pay off in the long run.”

Source:
COVID-19 -Media, Maps, Videos, Timelines, CDC/WHO Resources, etc. ***NO DISCUSSION***

—-

Take a look at this WHO Technical Update just on the vaccines, COVAX and the ACT Accelerator. This is all so unprecedented and really magnificent. I highly, highly recommended watching this, as I have only noted snippets above and didn’t provide transcriptions for all the speakers:

LIVE: COVID-19 ACT-Accelerator Technical Update and Press Briefing / June 26
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
152
Guests online
2,787
Total visitors
2,939

Forum statistics

Threads
603,656
Messages
18,160,408
Members
231,811
Latest member
mkbuchanan1983
Back
Top