SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,784
- Reaction score
- 181,544
That makes a lot of sense and you're probably right -- it's probably a combination of a number of things. Maybe the contact tracers could stand to brush up on their approach a bit--to put the people they contact at ease.
I'm guessing a contact tracer contacts an infected person and requests information about the people they've been in contact with. If there are any sorts of fines or punishments, I could see the infected person not complying because he/she didn't want to get a friend in trouble. That's a virtue instilled in most of us from childhood--not to tattle--not to get someone in trouble.
But, I'm only guessing that people are getting in trouble--I may be way off. I get where a small percentage of people might be undermining the contact tracers, but 74% seems huge. I do hope, however, that those who have been contacted take it upon themselves to notify their friends personally so those friends can be on the watch for symptoms and take extra precautions.
I believe that information given to contact tracers is covered by confidentiality laws.
No reason for a person to think they or others will get in trouble.
All aspects of case investigation and contact tracing must be voluntary, confidential, and culturally appropriate.
Minimum professional standards for any agency handling confidential information should include providing employees with appropriate information and/or training regarding confidential guidelines and legal regulations.
Health Departments
Principles for interactions with a person exposed to COVID-19:
- Ensure and protect confidentiality.
- Demonstrate ethical and professional conduct.
- Create a judgement-free zone.
- ....... (more)