lucegirl
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2013
- Messages
- 547
- Reaction score
- 5,845
SOS received - I’m in the midst of something for work so I’m trailing behind.
Generally a motion in limini is based on the expected evidence at trial and representations made by the movant at that time. If the evidence unfolds in a way that is not expected, the judge can change the ruling.
Like if the court granted a motion to exclude evidence before trial but the movant later opens the door to the evidence the non-movement should seek reconsideration.
But this really only applies when the party against which the ruling was made, makes the case that the original ruling was premature and didn’t involve the facts they expected. In other words it would be an a$$ backwards motion.
I can’t imagine there is a crumb of evidence that helps her that wasn’t known
When they filed the motion. They fought bitterly to keep the phone out.
Generally a motion in limini is based on the expected evidence at trial and representations made by the movant at that time. If the evidence unfolds in a way that is not expected, the judge can change the ruling.
Like if the court granted a motion to exclude evidence before trial but the movant later opens the door to the evidence the non-movement should seek reconsideration.
But this really only applies when the party against which the ruling was made, makes the case that the original ruling was premature and didn’t involve the facts they expected. In other words it would be an a$$ backwards motion.
I can’t imagine there is a crumb of evidence that helps her that wasn’t known
When they filed the motion. They fought bitterly to keep the phone out.