CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #64

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
JS asking about the faucet -- determined to be a mixture of JFd and FD but you don't know how it got there?

No, I don't know. It's just that it's there. ..

JS: and you know FD had dinner there with his children? --
 
JS asking about the vehicles at 80 MS...

JS: were you aware when you interviewed MT on August 13th, that the red Tacoma left at 5:30am?

Witness: we didn't know that at the time.

JS: but on Friday, you narrated all the vehicles...

We didn't have that information at that time

JS : is there any video of anyone arriving at 80 MS prior to the truck leaving?

Witness saw no vehicles or bicycles or pedestrians arriving.
 
JS asking about the faucet -- determined to be a mixture of JFd and FD but you don't know how it got there?

No, I don't know. It's just that it's there. ..

JS: and you know FD had dinner there with his children? --
Like, WTF is the defense?

FD did it and Michelle didn't know (unwittingly helped)? Or he didn't do it (Michelle didn't co-conspire)?

My head is reeling.

MOO
 
JS asks if there was video of KM leaving 4 JC. No.

Camera was motion activated. Witness: we determined that with his phone history.

JS asks if it's possible that there were more fires than were shown, since the camera was motion activated.
 
JS asking witness if he told MT not to bring up the timeline.

Witness had an instruction from the DA to end the interview if MT continued to reference the timeline. [My read: no golden ticket, if she's going to continue lying.]
 
State objection to Defence characterisation of Det Kimball "narrating"

Slimeball move imo as all these prior objections had been denied.

Lot's of 'thrusting' and asking Det Kimball any/all vehicles and bikes he has seen...

MOO
 
JS is asking the witness if FD added to the timeline after MT left.

Witness does not know.

JS is asking if MT told FD to add more things to the timeline.

LE had a photocopy of MT's timeline.

JS is trying to establish that Atty Bowman had the original. Kimball would not budge. He doesn't know if that's the original timeline or another one.
 
JS is asking witness if he was aware of -- who -- saying someone's wife was a f'ing b*tch. I think that it was asked of PG if MT ever said that.

Objection.

Hearsay within hearsay.
 
L&C is having 'quite the day':

"Horns 1st 2nd and 3rd wife just had traumatic flashbacks"

"I think horn is on the 3rd season of Love on the Spectrum"

"Kent and Schoenhorn should have gone in business together.."

"Just fishing around"

"Horn has been a great Prosecution witness at times"

"Horn is yet to have a consistent line of questioning"

"This guy is incapable of an accurate quote. He likes to paraphrase everything".

"He acts like he is presenting some great mistake he caught, when his client changed her accounting of events as evidence was presented to her".

"She was giving Fotis a full detail".

"The high on May 24, 2019 was 71 degrees. That does make the fireplace burning a bit suspicious."








MOO
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
1,539
Total visitors
1,680

Forum statistics

Threads
605,596
Messages
18,189,481
Members
233,453
Latest member
Manga
Back
Top