Silver Alert CT- Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 #6 *ARRESTS*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rosiebones said:
Norm said that wasn't MT smoking a cigarette. I wonder if he was playing word games again and being precise to the point of absurdity and she was smoking a joint. Both make smoke and from a distance who can tell the difference.
Click to expand...
I agree. Maybe MT was not smoking but it was her. Although, LE could’ve possibly retrieved the cigarette butt which would’ve indicated otherwise.
 
oviedo said:
CT - Jennifer Farber Dulos,50 media *NO DISCUSSION*

Thanks to everyone who contributed the tweets from the 2 hearings today. End result - FD is out on bail with a GPS monitor and restricted radius and the Judge won't rule on Mom's Motion to Intervene in custody matter - found out FD has an IRA (or 401K depending on who is talking) and that they have his DNA mixed with her blood on a faucet in her home. anything else? oh yes, he was at the JD house Wednesday 5/22 - apparently outside and he didn't want to go inside so his DNA wouldn't be found. All from twitter today.
Click to expand...
And someone told LE that FD said he didn't want to go into JD's residence because any of his hair shed would leave DNA. That remark was the only remark in court today that FD reacted to visibly, in my observation.

jmo
 
Inthedetails said:
And someone told LE that FD said he didn't want to go into JD's residence because any of his hair shed would leave DNA. That remark was the only remark in court today that FD reacted to visibly, in my observation.

jmo
Click to expand...
Probably because that’s a stunningly stupid thing to say.

Not quite as dumb as his evidence dumping, but it’s up there.
 
Amster said:
IF innocent until proven guilty truly is applied.....then, FD should be allowed, at the very least, monitored communication with his children. UNLESS, Meehan can demonstrate it would be harmful. The older twins are 13. Surely, they would know if FD was at their home the Wed. before their mom went missing. Unless, they weren't there for some reason.
Click to expand...
I would think this Judge who is aware of his behavior during this process - has to look at her prior order (supervised sat/sun no overnight, monitored speakerphone conversations) and ask herself - what has changed? Why would I alter my ruling? Why would I bar an absent mother's Mom from intervening and look at the case law and custody under CT law - and at the very least IMO rule Mom can step in act as JD did, and FD can have what he had before. or she can have common sense and keep the order not allowing him to see the children in place while this plays out. I will be interested to see her ruling and then Mom's reaction. JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 165 more.
Total: 1,836 (members: 166, guests: 1,670)

Online statistics

Members online
166
Guests online
1,670
Total visitors
1,836
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
600,018
Messages
18,102,687
Members
230,968
Latest member
Mr Eric
Back
Top