I have come to agree with you that MT is involved up to her eyeballs. At first I thought she was just a horrible person who looked the other way and seemed to feel no solidarity with this mother of her lovers' children, but it's clear it is more than that - she lies and lies and wants to plea the 5th because she can incriminate herself? Isn't that an admission of guilt, really? She cannot come clean because she conspired with her lover to murder. She should wise up and make a really plea deal and accept she will do some time.
It’s just incomprehensible to me that someone would go along with the murder of someone else. Especially another woman. Not that us girls aren’t evil too. There are some women I wouldn’t trust with my shoelaces or ever get into a foxhole with.
My cousin’s husband is a sheriff and he will tell you they absolutely hate being called into domestic violence situations because they will arrive and see the female all beat up on the couch and the husband clearly responsible and once they put the cuffs on the male, the female launches at the cop kicking and spitting and bitting and hitting. Us girls just sometimes get a pass because people are less suspicious of us. Never turn your back on us. Lol.
Luckily CT doesn’t distinguish between murder and accomplice to murder. So as an accomplice even if she wasn’t in NC at the time of JDs death and original crime scene clean up and disposal she will still be charged with murder if she is seen to be an accomplice. Which by lying to cops multiple times after being separated from FD did not help her case that she was not involved a lot more than just riding along in the Raptor while FD dumped trashbags in The trashbin odyssey of stupidity.
It’s going to be difficult for her attorney to elicit sympathy for her. She has a poor moral character. And so if they try this “FD came home and told me he killed JD and I had to help him or he’d kill me or my daughter,” narrative, MT, by lying on multiple interviews to the cops, didn’t help herself there.
A small caveat: if there is a third person that is not MT (accomplice for the 24/25th) it is entirely possible that this person was used as a threat to get her to comply. It’s possible that she thought her memorization of the timeline would get her past an LE interrogation and once they tore apart her statements she, instead of asking for help, continued to dig herself deeper with more lies. Like she unwisely just doubled down on her story and tried to make it more plausible.
We will know soon enough what the State thinks of her involvement. We will know if she is necessary to help the prosecution if they give her a deal. We will know everything they know about MT and they will charge her with what they know they can prove.
I think she is in deep stuff. How deep we will soon find out. How involved we will know. We will know based on the charges and how necessary she is to the state. JMO.
