How do we know that GH's depiction is accurate?
In other cases here on WS his opinion has not been considered at all in fact he has been somewhat disparaged as being inaccurate so much that many posters rolled their eyes when
his name came up.
I've never followed him so no opinion. Just passing on what others on WS have thought.
I watched the latest episode on the 2nd arrest warrant and the same type of episode on the 1st arrest . IMO GH followed the timeline listed in the AR and his placement of the vehicles on google earth maps was good and I believe correct. I dont' pay any attention to his chit chat with his viewers and I dont' read the viewer comments. I simply wanted to see the visuals of the trip travelled and vehicle placement in the context of an overall timeline. Saved me having to do it myself and so was a huge timesaver. Where he show dragged due to chit chat, I simply fast forwarded!
I've been working on this timeline myself and I saw the challenges GH had as we don't know a number of things even with the 2nd AW:
1. Route taken to Welles and where was FD hiding at Welles. Were the garage doors open or closed?
2. Transport method to Welles - bike, jog, accomplice drop off
3. Did FD leave Welles during the period that the 2nd AW states he was at Welles or did another vehicle arrive at Welles while FD was in garage? We don't know.
4. Route taken from Welles to Waveny/Lapham Rd
5. Time Gap on Waveny/Lapham Rd.
So, I just focused on the visuals being presented in google earth and the vehicle placement and didn't spend much time listening to the GH speculation on getting to and from Welles etc.
I wouldn't have paid much attention to the program if for example there was much in the way of speculation or opinion from GH about what happened or how it was done. I believe he does these kinds of more speculative episodes but the one I last posted was a program where he stayed on point based on the AW info and for that reason I watched it as it saved me having to do what he did.
The other thing he did that I found super helpful was to verify along the routes travelled where the cameras were that took the pictures. It took him a good amt of time to do the work on the 2nd AW and IMO he did a good job and I know it saved me having to do the same work myself and I'm glad to save time to spend it doing other things. From his analysis I learned that the video of Welles was not from a camera on JD property but from one of the neighbors. I also learned that the CCTV of FD returning to 4Jx were from neighbors camera and not from FD property.
Hope this helps explain why I found this particular video useful. Would I spend the time on a long video of viewer chit chat and GF speculation on this case? No, I simply dont' have the time but I'm sure others will and do it all the time as he is popular on youtube.
MOO