Ok,
@Seattle1 so are you saying that FD as a most likly participant in this family insurance plan had some limited access to the EOB information which had service dollar amounts, perhaps some service coding data, but not provider information?
The last motion which was denied was to gain provider information via going to Anthem BCBS in CT and then using that info to get to the names of JD doctors in NY. This motion was denied.
BUT, this entire issue of the JD medical records has now resurfaced with Pattis/FD and I'm trying to figure out what is different from this latest motion from the last one that was denied? What additional information could they now have that was not present at the time of the last motion?
I am also interested in whether or not Atty Colangelo or his staff confirmed that the access made by FD/Pattis to gain whatever information from the EOB that they have was legally done and that it wasn't done using JD access code or login for example?