BUT, this entire issue of the JD medical records has now resurfaced with Pattis/FD and I'm trying to figure out what is different in this latest motion from the last one that was denied? What additional information could they now have that was not present at the time of the last motion?
^^sbm
NP made the motion for in-court camera review of JD's medical records for a variety of bogus claims including that he didn't have to take the arrest warrants at face value, and that the State had given them zero information to support their allegations against FD.
He tried to convince the court that he was entitled to something -- to develop an alternative theory.
NP stated defense came into possession of $14,000 tests, and "received them as items having been paid by Anthem Blue Cross." (NP even tried to hint that JD was pregnant -- throwing in possible reproductive tests)!
Judge denied the motion, stating defense did not sufficiently show any basis for inspecting JD's medical records.
As to your question why are they bringing up medical information again since last denial, I believe it's based on the following:
After motion was denied, NP told the court that he wanted the motion dismissed without prejudice as he vowed to bring it up again -- renew the motion-- if the Court Study in family court surfaced (sealed and no access). NP stated he was not at liberty to put this info on the record, "reiterate what I discussed in Chambers." Judge agreed to deny motion without prejudice.
On Sept 20, family court judge tossed psych report that favored FD, and ordered the court appointed psychiatrist testimony stricken from the record, and court study report remained sealed. Violation subject to sanctions.
If NP is bringing up medical records again -- I can only surmise that he's using his same argument that he has nothing from the State to work with, family court report sealed, and defense entitled to discover medical evidence to support alternate theory. In all his drama -- NP renewing "he won't idly sit by."
In other words, it was expected NP would renew request to inspect JD's medical records.
I take it as the same attempt by defense to fish for info.
MOO
ETA:
Jennifer Dulos divorce: Judge tosses psych exam that favored Fotis Dulos