Alathea
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2019
- Messages
- 1,512
- Reaction score
- 19,569
RSBM/BBM This is SO important, and so crystal clear. It really speaks loudly about how Fd does not care about those 5 children, their welfare or their futures.Glad to see that Danbury Savings Bank is finally waking up to the fact that they have an 'issue' with this property in terms of valuation and marketability. . .. I just wonder if the Civil case ever got to the bottom of whether the Fd "Friend loans" were actually funded or not and whether the trade liens were real and true or whether they were simply sham tools set up by friends of FD too? Are these just shams that have been documented by Fd attorney (believed to be Atty Markowitz) to give the appearance of a loan but aren't in fact loans? ....
The irony of all of this is that the actual beneficiary I believe of any collections on the Civil Suit are the 5 Dulos children. SO, to see Fd/FORE go to the lengths that it is to keep money out of the hands of his own children who he has done ZERO to financially support since JFd left 4Jx in 2017 is actually something I have no issue labelling as 'monstrous'! Yep, something else to add to the growing list of documented 'monstrous' behaviour.
I do wonder though given the scope of the FORE real estate and the clearly documented games that appear to be going on whether a State appointed receiver might not just be the only way to ensure that creditors are protected? I am not convinced that FORE or Fd is operating in good faith on any level with regards to its legal obligations and so outside intervention might just been needed to ensure fair dealing.
MOO
"The irony of all of this is that the actual beneficiary I believe of any collections on the Civil Suit are the 5 Dulos children. SO, to see Fd/FORE go to the lengths that it is to keep money out of the hands of his own children who he has done ZERO to financially support since JFd left 4Jx in 2017 is actually something I have no issue labelling as 'monstrous'!"
Last edited: