Silver Alert CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #33

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m sure most Greeks like myself are mortified “one of our own” committed such an atrocious act. I’m not surprised they’ve distanced themselves if they knew him. Since FD grew up in Greece, he had religious education in primary school. There is no separation of church and state there and religion is taught as part of the curriculum. With that said, a lot of Greeks, especially those who live in Greece, don’t attend church regularly but keep the customs and vehemently defend them. The religion has become part of the cultural identity. I’m not surprised at all he became belligerent in regards to his youngest daughters name to be Cleo.

it’s a dichotomy. Greeks living in Greece rarely attend church ( they don’t trust it as there has been corruption issues) but many still keep the traditions of naming their children after their parents and baptizing the children in the church. Greeks developed a fierce patriotism while under the Ottoman rule. For 400 years our language, religion and culture was under siege and it’s the fierce patriotism and adherence that kept it alive.

Please do read about Orthodoxy. It’s the first church in Christianity and nothing has changed in all the years. IMO, it’s a beautiful faith that I was born into but later on undertook my own studies to understand it and appreciate the faith much more now.

As a side note - I know the priest at the Hartford church!!! He was a priest at a small church in a city I lived in at the time. Wonderful man!

JMO
@glassheater, Thank you for this comment as it provides so much useful information and insight about what Fd experienced growing up in Greece in terms of school and religion. Its great that you say the priest in Hartford is a wonderful man, I hope Fd seeks him out for counselling and guidance as Fd is no doubt in a very bad personal situation and my guess is that things won't get any better any time soon for him! I have a million and one questions about all things Greece, but here are a few that have been discussed by many others here on the threads. My books on the Orthodox religion should arrive soon and I look forward to reading them very much.

As you point out, FD was adamant about Greek language being learned by the children as their early nanny is believed to have only spoken Greek and the children did have access to their Grandmother as they were learning to speak. The children at the time they were living at 4Jx were most likely too small to begin any religious education but perhaps did have exposure to going to church? IDK. We also don't know if JFd converted to Greek Orthodox (some believe she might have) from Judaism (which is believed to be the religion of her birth). Would you think that Fd required that JFd convert to his faith at the time of their marriage and even perhaps learn Greek? We have none of these details unfortunately.

I think many here have been trying to understand about Fd and how his childhood in Athens might have shaped him, his experience in the US and possibly even impacted his marriage to JFd. We have never had much knowledge of his situation growing up, other than he grew up in Athens (moved to Athen from Istanbul where he had been born) to what looked to be a possibly prosperous family and he had a 'sister' who was 13 years older. During the 1970s as Fd was growing up in Athen, how his experiences there might have made him a bit more traditional in his views on family vs. his counterparts in the US growing up at the same time. The impact of the 1960s might perhaps have hit Greece later than the US? Might Greece in the 1970s have been much more traditional than the US or is this an incorrect assumption?

Fd and his 'sister' are privately educated and both have graduate level education. Fd came to the US to attend college and graduate school, got married and never returned to live in Greece. We don't know about his military service status or whether as the only male sibling in his family whether that exempted him from service?

What we have been trying to figure out is whether JFd might not have understood some of the traditional cultural roles that might have been ingrained in Fd while growing up in Athens and might have been blindsided by them after the marriage. So to JFd, Fd might have on the surface seemed culturally similar to some of the individuals she met at Brown or had grown up with in NY, but in reality he was very different from her peers in terms of various cultural issues such as religion, language, roles in the marriage, child rearing responsibilities etc.

We have been also trying to understand the presence of a Greek community in Istanbul and why the Duolos/Dulos family might have immigrated from Turkey to Greece many years ago (mid 1960s). Was this done for economic reasons or was there ongoing discrimination and persecution of Christians or Greeks going on at the time in Istanbul that would make moving advantageous to the family? I found it baffling that when I asked someone that was part of the Greek Orthodox community locally about Fd, their first comment was that he was 'a Turk' and not 'a Greek'. This wasn't someone I knew and it was just a conversation in passing. Would you expect someone that might have been part of an expat Greek community in Turkey to be referred to as a Turk and not as a Greek?

How might being the only male child have impacted Fd experience growing up? Did this really matter or not?

JFd grew up in NY, amidst privilege and did experience multiculturalism but was this experience growing up enough to prepare her for a husband who might have believed her only role was in the home and taking care of children? Is it possible that someone of Fd generation believed that JFd continuing to write or work was something that wasn't to be done?

We have seen multiple examples of Fd denigrating JFd writing and he seemed to resent the time this work took away from him and possibly the children. JFd wrote professionally and had graduate training in writing as well and by all accounts we have read was a skilled writer and professional.

Fd picked up JFd and moved her to a place very culturally distant from NY and largely isolated her in the suburban enviorment of Farmington while he 'worked' to build his Company. JFd had 5 children in rapid succession and 2 sets of twins and by all accounts was devoted to her children. We have seen many many reports of JFd being very involved in her childrens education and activities but parents and school officials never recall seeing Fd present at any of the school events or even showing any interest in the goings on at school. Would this lack of involvement in activities relating to the children be something typical of most males of Fd generation or is this unusual?

In many respects Fd behaviour towards his wife and family that we have seen in the Family Court documents makes him seem like a throwback to another generation based on American standards IMO. The fact that we see Fd conducting by all accounts multiple affairs in the marriage and then conducting a longer term affair with MT might also be cultural too, but is it? Curious about cultural views in Greece towards marriage and infidelity. Do women look the other way to affairs or simply conduct affairs of their own and keep the marriage together for family and children? We saw Fd by all accounts enraged by JFd leaving him with the 5 children when she left and filed for divorce in 2017. But, he seemed more enraged by the actual act of her leaving (act of defiance) and not concerned about her well being or the well being of the children, oddly enough. The children seemed to be viewed as possessions and he didn't seem very involved with them at all and left the children to JFd to manage and care for by all accounts. Fd for lack of a better word seemed distant from his family but obsessed with the image of having a large and intact family. His plan to have MT and her daughter live at 4Jx while JFd lived there or commuted there with the children seems beyond the comprehension of most here. But was this view of Fd's culturally driven as well in that he as the male in the family could dictate what would happen with the marriage and the female partner would simply fall in line with his wishes?

Recently we have been looking at the immediate cremation of Fd mother when she died after being run over by a car in her driveway. We have heard various views about the acceptability of cremation within the Orthodox community of a woman Mama Duolos/Dulos generation. We thought it odd that husband and wife would not be buried next to each other as Papa Duolos/Dulos has a gravestone and was buried in a traditional manner but his wife was immediately cremated and is not believed to have a gravestone next to her husband.

I think the other major issue that we have run into that has been somewhat baffling is Fd view towards the courts, the law, rules and regulations and government in general. We saw him taking the oath to testify in Family Court and then lie on the stand multiple times, we have seen him provide financial documents to Family Court that were not true and we saw him using money from the marriage to entertain, house and travel with a mistress all the while charging his wife for childcare help (Fd had JFd pay for childcare and education by all accounts)? Is this view towards Govt and the law something Fd might have seen growing up in Greece? He seemed to run his financial life in his Company as his own personal piggy bank and then kept very poor records and didn't seem to file his taxes for the last 2 years. He seemed to make no attempt to comply with court orders or properly respond to requests from the court. He had a general view that rules were for others but not for him? Could he have gotten these views from his experience growing up or perhaps watching his father operate a business in Greece?

So many questions about Fd go back to his childhood and sadly we know little about it. Any help to possibly understanding it would be valuable I think especially as the trial process moves forward in order to try and understand how it might have shaped him.

MOO
 
SC 20363 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. FOTIS DULOS

SC 190166 12/10/2019 FOTIS DULOS Motion to Correct

liLE.gif
PRELIMINARY PAPER/APPEAL DOCUMENTS
12/10/2019 Errata Document Correcting Error(s) in Brief

http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=TaSL/QY/nbmK8/I03Idz7w==
 
I continue to read studies done on 'recreational' drug users and the resultant symptoms of paranoia that these people exhibit. It comes on subtly at first until
some time later, and with continued drug use,
it can manifest as full blown psychosis.
Wouldn't surprise me at all if some of these players don't have a few dead cells in their cranium from too many substances.
afitzy, it may not be your imagination at all.
It could be the nuances of a pattern of behavior
and you're just smart enough to pick up on it.
That's how I've noticed it in real life. Like hUH?? What just happened here. Is he paranoid or what?

Seems like he can't even get the name of the CT Chief Justice right, so there may be something in what you say.
 
Jennifer Dulos case: What you need to know about the gag order up for appeal
The arguments will be heard at 10 a.m. Thursday at the state Supreme Court in Hartford.
Here’s what you need to know about the case’s gag order:
What is the gag order?
Superior Court Judge John Blawie issued the gag order in September after a request by the State’s Attorney’s Office.
The order prohibits all parties involved in the criminal proceedings against Fotis Dulos — the defense and prosecution in the case, their respective staffs, all potential witnesses and local and state police — from making “extrajudicial comments.”
“The court finds that a substantial likelihood exists that the continued dissemination of extrajudicial comments by the parties identified in this order carries a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing a fair trial in this case,” Blawie wrote in his order.
Under the order, involved parties are restricted in five ways.
First, parties are not allowed to comment on the character, credibility, reputation or criminal record of a party, victim, or witness, or the identity of a witness, or the expected testimony of a party or witness.

Second, no comments can be made about the possibility of a plea of guilty to the offense or the existence or contents of any confession, admission, or statement given by a defendant or suspect, or that person’s refusal or failure to make a statement.


Third, no one is allowed to share anything regarding the performance or results of any examination or test or the refusal or failure of a person to submit to an examination or test, or the identity or nature of physical evidence expected to be presented.

Fourth, the dissemination of information that the parties know or reasonably should know is likely to be inadmissible as evidence in a trial and that would, if disclosed, create a substantial risk of prejudicing an impartial trial is off limits.

Lastly, any opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant, Fotis Dulos, is not to be shared.

Blawie wrote that the order largely reinforces existing attorney conduct laws in the face of intense media and public interest. What the order does is permit “the court to act promptly when faced with a possible violation by any of the trial participants subject to its terms.”

The gag order is to remain in place until a final verdict can be reached in the case.

In October, attorney Norm Pattis, who represents Fotis Dulos, filed an appeal with the Connecticut Supreme Court seeking to have the gag order overturned.
State’s Attorney Richard Colangelo speaks as Fotis Dulos, charged with two counts of tampering with evidence and hindering prosecution in the disappearance of his wife, appears at Stamford Superior Court with his attorney Kevin Smith for a pretrial hearing Friday, October 4, 2019, in Stamford.

argument for the gag order

State’s Attorney Richard Colangelo Jr. first requested a gag order in August, citing “prejudicial” statements being made to the media.

Colangelo warned that the state’s case against Fotis Dulos could be compromised and become a “media sideshow,” unless a judge imposed a gag order on both attorneys.

The motion sought an “order preventing the parties from making statements to the media or in public settings that post a substantial likelihood of material prejudice to the case.”

“An essential tenet of the American justice system is that a criminal trial is not a referendum, and its outcome should never be determined by public-relations campaigns in the court of public opinion. Rather, verdicts must be based on evidence and argument received in court, untainted by outside influence,” Colangelo later wrote in a memo supporting the motion.

Pattis, who has a reputation as an outspoken advocate and legal maverick, was frequently quoted in the media in the early stages of criminal proceedings against Fotis Dulos.

Some lawyers and legal experts saw Pattis' strategy as an effort to influence potential jurors and combat the impression, based on filings in the couple’s bitter two-year divorce, that Fotis Dulos was a bullying husband and domineering father who may have killed his wife and disposed of her body.

Pattis has theorized that Jennifer Dulos authored her own disappearance a la the novel “Gone Girl.” Pattis has also suggested that the 51-year-old New Canaan mother might have perpetrated a “revenge suicide” plot. His theories have drawn sharp rebukes from Jennifer Dulos’ family and friends and “Gone Girl” author Gillian Flynn.

In an interview with WPLR’s Chaz and AJ, Pattis also claimed that co-defendant Michelle Troconis passed a polygraph test. However, Colangelo said Troconis has never taken a polygraph.

Senior Assistant State’s Attorney Robert Scheinblum, who will represent the state before the Supreme Court, agreed with Colangelo, arguing in a separate brief filed last month that the gag order should be upheld to quell some of the massive publicity surrounding the May 24 disappearance.

“The gag order was necessary to safeguard the state’s compelling interest in securing a fair trial for the defendant untainted by the influence of an extreme amount of prejudicial publicity surrounding the case,” Scheinblum said.
Fotis Dulos' attorney Norm Pattis speaks during his client's hearing at the Connecticut Superior Court in Stamford, Conn. Monday, Sept. 23, 2019.

Fotis Dulos' attorney Norm Pattis speaks during his client's...

The argument against the gag order

One of the few things Pattis and Colangelo seem to agree on is that the criminal case against Fotis Dulos is in danger of being prejudiced by the media. However Pattis, unlike the state, claims the gag order is to blame.

Pattis said in a 21-page brief filed with the Supreme Court last week that he was hired to ensure Fotis Dulos did not incur a murder charge in the disappearance of his estranged wife and to “meet blow for blow, the torrent of publicity fanned by his arrest warrant’s release.”

But the gag order, he claims, has prevented him from doing just that.

“Much like a defendant waiving his right to remain silent or his right to a jury trial, Mr. Dulos opted for a bold, public strategy in his own defense,” Pattis wrote in the brief. “The state, whose charging decisions rebound to its strategic benefit, sought to silence Mr. Dulos’ criticism to reap maximum benefit from the unusual manner in which it proceeds.”

The order, Pattis argues, deprives his client of the right “to respond to damaging public comments fueled in large part by the warrant filed on existing charges and the sotto voce whispering of tattle-tale officers whispering innuendo to eager reporters,” Pattis wrote in a September motion opposing the gag order.

“To expect, much less to order, Mr. Dulos and his counsel to remain silent would be grievous error,” Pattis said.

Pattis pointed out the warrants also say Fotis Dulos traveled to the home and was "lying in wait" for his estranged wife and "he then disposed of her body."

"Media worldwide have reported law enforcement speculation as fact, prejudicing potential jurors to believe that Mr. Dulos is not only guilty of those crimes with which he has been charged, but also — if not foremost — guilty of the heinous crime with which he has not been charged: Murder," Pattis wrote in the brief.

The gag order "freezes" Fotis Dulos "in the exercise of his First Amendment right to speak out about potential charges not yet filed," said Pattis, who also contends the order "deprives him of his Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial."
Fotis Dulos, charged with two counts of tampering with evidence and hindering prosecution in the disappearance of his wife, appears with his attorney Kevin Smith, who gestures to the media that his lips are sealed because of the gag order.

Fotis Dulos, charged with two counts of tampering with evidence and...

Gag order’s precedence

Gag orders are a rarity, and the Connecticut Constitution goes even further to provide First Amendment free speech rights than the federal Constitution, according to David Schulz, the director of the Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic at Yale Law School.

Normally, a gag order in a criminal case only applies to the parties and their attorneys, Schulz said. The gag order issued by Blawie, Schulz argued, is overly broad and encompasses family members and potential witnesses, which has the effect of restricting the rights of news organizations to report on the case.

“There is very clear federal law and a lot of controlling precedent that Connecticut judges must go by,” Schulz said.

Gag orders to protect trial rights limit free speech, and there are other tools a judge can use to ensure a fair trial, he said.

“There’s the voir dire of jurors and appropriate instructions to jurors that don’t require keeping the public in the dark,” he said.

Jurors are not required to have no previous knowledge of a particular case, Schulz said.

“What voir dire does is find jurors who will come in with an open mind,” he added. “They only need 12. This is a large area, there are certainly 12 people who will be able to do that.”

That’s why when the Connecticut Supreme Court agreed in October to hear an appeal of the gag order, the opportunity was welcomed by attorneys on both sides of the case.

Scheinblum agreed to the appeal on the grounds he wanted the state’s highest court to set precedent on whether judges can impose a restriction on speech in high publicity cases.

“Our appellate courts have yet to address the appropriate legal standard for imposing a gag order; accordingly, hearing this appeal would provide guidance to the trial bench on the law that applies,” Scheinblum wrote in a 33-page brief filed to the Supreme Court in October.
Fotis Dulos' attorney Norm Pattis speaks during his client's hearing at the Connecticut Superior Court in Stamford, Conn. Monday, Sept. 23, 2019.

Fotis Dulos' attorney Norm Pattis speaks during his client's...

On the other hand, Pattis, like Schulz, argued the gag order was “overly broad” and infringed on freedom of speech.

Pattis cited the 1976 ruling in Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart in which the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a “content-based judicial prior restraint on the press (known as a ‘gag order’) designed to prevent prejudicial pretrial publicity.”

However, Scheinblum contends the case doesn’t apply, since the Dulos gag order does not put any restrictions on the media.

“Contrary to the defendant’s assertion, the trial court judge (Blawie) properly recognized the distinction between the gag orders directed at the media, which are subject to strict scrutiny, and those directed at trial participants, which are subject to lesser scrutiny,” Scheinblum said.

Scheinblum refuted Pattis’ assertion that the gag order is too broad, saying Blawie’s order specifically targets certain types of speech that could impact the criminal cases against Fotis Dulos.

Fotis Dulos is allowed to proclaim his innocence under the order, Scheinblum said. It does not prohibit the media or the public from disseminating information — a distinction that Scheinblum said doesn’t support Pattis’ argument that it’s a form of “prior restraint” already struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Jennifer Dulos case: What you need to know about the gag order up for appeal
 
IMO NCPD has no staffing issues and they also have one of the largest PD budgets per capita in the State. My sense is that the staffing situation was impacted by the search process and the protection possibly of Welles in the early days of the case. State Police took on the investigation and management of the case so I'm curious what NCPD is using now in terms of its resources for the investigation. My guess is that the staffing issues could perhaps be at the State Police level as the State has been hit by a whole series of very serious crimes recently (4 big cases just in the last month with the Vanessa Morales case in Ansonia being the most recent). Perhaps short staffing at the State Police has pushed back on the locals? IDK.

This could also be possibly about reimbursement issues for the investigation as there is always ongoing argument about reimbursement from Hartford for anything whether its education or any number of other issues. IMO money flows one way strongly (to Hartford) and not so strongly back to Fairfield County but this is a political debate that has been going on for 100s of years and won't be resolved to anyones satisfaction ever unfortunately!

MOO

I had wondered whether the best breed of "scent" dogs was used in the searches. Looking at the photos I saw German shepherds, golden retrievers, possibly "Malinois"--but no bloodhounds. Yesterday on TV a guy was talking about the bloodhound's particular physical characteristics that made it the best dog for the job, incl long ears that kept the scent close to its nose and scent receptors, it's drool, which captures the scent. I looked up scent dogs on web, on list of top 10, bloodhounds were tops (also with most scent receptors), followed by basset hounds, beagles. The GS and GR were in the top 10 but not near the top. Today SA had article about missing woman in Stmfd--says they used a bloodhound (tho' no success). But if Stmf PD had a bloodhound, why didn't NCPD ask to borrow it?

Stamford mother missing; police ask for help finding her
 
I had wondered whether the best breed of "scent" dogs was used in the searches. Looking at the photos I saw German shepherds, golden retrievers, possibly "Malinois"--but no bloodhounds. Yesterday on TV a guy was talking about the bloodhound's particular physical characteristics that made it the best dog for the job, incl long ears that kept the scent close to its nose and scent receptors, it's drool, which captures the scent. I looked up scent dogs on web, on list of top 10, bloodhounds were tops (also with most scent receptors), followed by basset hounds, beagles. The GS and GR were in the top 10 but not near the top. Today SA had article about missing woman in Stmfd--says they used a bloodhound (tho' no success). But if Stmf PD had a bloodhound, why didn't NCPD ask to borrow it?

Stamford mother missing; police ask for help finding her
Maybe they were cadaver dogs. Bloodhounds have amazing senses of smell but the other breeds have their own advantages that make them better suited.

EvidenceProf Blog: Dog Day Afternoon: Casey Anthony Trial Raises Questions About Cadaver Dogs

Deputy Pikett testified that all dogs have a more acute sense of smell than humans and that bloodhounds have an olfactory sense that is 26 times that of a human. Deputy Pikett explained that because a cadaver dog need not distinguish between the scents of different individuals and need only distinguish between the scent of human and animal remains, a breed such as a bloodhound that is traditionally known for its acuteness of scent is not necessary to use as a cadaver dog. Deputy Pikett further explained that a bloodhound is typically not a good cadaver search dog because bloodhounds are “not great obedience dogs” and typically must be worked on a lead, or leash. Deputy Pikett testified that in a large area search, a dog that can work off-lead is more credible because it is free to make an independent find, without the possibility that its handler will lead it to a particular area. Deputy Pikett said that other breeds, "such as Rottweilers mixed-breeds, Lab[radors] and so forth" can perform as cadaver dogs.


Edit to add: it's also been said that bloodhounds aren't exactly the most intelligent breed and can get confused sometimes with certain requests, like if a handler asks them to track something that is dead.
 
OMG--Pattis addresses Chief Justice Richard ROBINSON as "Robertson"! Can't blame that error on the Westlaw citation, Norm! (I can't stand it!) Ah, and he faces the CJ tomorrow at the oral argument... I'll be watching, will you?

Great catches @pernickety....Norm can't seem to get it right!! (No sympathy intended...)

I'll watch if I can find it online. Wonder if NP will interrupt the Justices? :confused:
 
SC 20363 STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. FOTIS DULOS

SC 190166 12/10/2019 FOTIS DULOS Motion to Correct

liLE.gif
PRELIMINARY PAPER/APPEAL DOCUMENTS
12/10/2019 Errata Document Correcting Error(s) in Brief

http://appellateinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentDisplayer.aspx?AppId=2&DocId=TaSL/QY/nbmK8/I03Idz7w==
OOPS, looked like the ball was dropped in a motion YET AGAIN by Pattisville!

I have to admit to being surprised that the ERRATA Document didn't also take the opportunity to also address mischaracterisations of FACT by Atty. P. as well in the motion and recast the fundamental assertion made that the Judge Blawie doesn't allow any speech which IMO is patently false.

My guess is that Fd will look back on the Judge Blawie gag order from prison years from now and realise that it did more to insure that he received a fair trial than anything done by Atty. P. and Pattisville.

My hope is that the State will point out the many and sundry references made in the Atty. P. document that play a bit 'fast and loose' with the truth IMO and which also IMO necessitated the Judge Blawie order in the first place.

As Atty. P. said, "GAME ON"!

MOO
 
@MarissaAlter

PRAYERS FOR JENNIFER: the New Canaan community isn’t forgetting about missing mother of 5 Jennifer Dulos. Ornaments like this one are popping up on trees and wreaths in front of businesses all over New Canaan.
No one is sure who’s behind the ornaments, but everyone supports the gesture. It’s been more than six months since Jennifer Dulos was last seen dropping her kids off at school in New Canaan.
One business owner told me she was so touched when she showed up to work and saw the ornament on the tree, she started crying. Hear from her today on@News12CT


 

Attachments

  • ornament2.jpg
    ornament2.jpg
    126.4 KB · Views: 58
  • ornament.jpg
    ornament.jpg
    179 KB · Views: 66
  • jfjwreath.jpg
    jfjwreath.jpg
    193.1 KB · Views: 53
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
139
Guests online
1,856
Total visitors
1,995

Forum statistics

Threads
600,229
Messages
18,105,597
Members
230,992
Latest member
Bella257
Back
Top