afitzy
Former Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 11,285
- Reaction score
- 126,557
After watching the Atty. P. 'performance' in Court today I do have to question why the names of private citizens were read out in Court and why there was nothing presented to substantiate the claims of Atty. P. that Fd privacy had been violated in his house.
Neither the Judge nor Atty Colangelo objected to anything that Atty. P. seemed to say today on these 2 issues and I'm not sure why?
Very disappointing on so many levels. Curious though if the FB Group mentioned was private or public? Not that it matters at all but if Pattisville is now infiltrating Private FB Groups then perhaps further discussion with the State and Judge might be needed. When you combine the Atty. P. threatening/menancing statements made outside Court regarding the person that supposedly invaded Fd privacy with his reading the names of private citizens out in Court, I think this is all quite concerning!
Does this mean that Atty. P. will use private investigators to track down social media commentators or otherwise publicly threaten them or will he report them in public during his next Court appearance?
MOO
Neither the Judge nor Atty Colangelo objected to anything that Atty. P. seemed to say today on these 2 issues and I'm not sure why?
Very disappointing on so many levels. Curious though if the FB Group mentioned was private or public? Not that it matters at all but if Pattisville is now infiltrating Private FB Groups then perhaps further discussion with the State and Judge might be needed. When you combine the Atty. P. threatening/menancing statements made outside Court regarding the person that supposedly invaded Fd privacy with his reading the names of private citizens out in Court, I think this is all quite concerning!
Does this mean that Atty. P. will use private investigators to track down social media commentators or otherwise publicly threaten them or will he report them in public during his next Court appearance?
MOO