I think it is Norm who wants the state to preserve the evidence.
But if he really has evidence proving his innocence I would think he already knows what it is.
Imo
need hard facts, proof not just FD’s words
I think it is Norm who wants the state to preserve the evidence.
But if he really has evidence proving his innocence I would think he already knows what it is.
Imo
Very sadly this never stopped Atty. P. and Atty Rochlin from endlessly referring to this report and ditto for Dave Altimari of the HC.Heller has ordered Herman’s testimony stricken from the record, ruled the hearings as a mistrial, since they were never completed, and required that his report remained sealed. Heller also noted in the order that anyone who reveals or releases the report could face sanctions or contempt of court.
Jennifer Dulos divorce: Judge tosses psych exam that favored Fotis Dulos
Does anyone know if atty/client privilege is terminated upon the death of a client?
Many agree with you.
Most importantly, the children are no longer in danger of him taking them with him to his grave.
Also, their mother will (hopefully) not be dragged through the mud with lies about her.
If anything, his taking his own life further proves his deranged nature to the point where he would not have hesitated to take the life of another.
Note that this is NOT the same as a long-depressed individual who commits suicide.
One of my parents' best friends growing up in CT was a public defender until retirement. He always says that he "represented" clients rather than "defended" them. I think that is a very important line to draw, and one it seems evident that Norm Pattis and company stepped over long before even this case.
In a sense, Pattis really did his client no favors on the opposite side of that line. Perhaps, even unconsciously, this is what Pattis was really getting at yesterday when he declared that he failed FD. Pattis has to know this deep down in a fleeting moment of lucidity. I believe that FD was guilty, but I also believe that his representation failed him. Pattis fed the media machine he continued to blame, and I believe he did it out of his own selfishness.
I'm not saying FD is a victim by ANY means. He chose this aggressive, media-thirsty attorney with eyes wide open. It's just a shame to see things go down like this. FD got away with it in my eyes because he maintained control until the end, even if it had to be whether he personally live or died. MOO.
Would he even be able to give any information with Attorney Client Privilege?
Think the news would have reported it if they saw his kids going to see him before he died?
Anyone medical who knows if this sounds like an organ transplant situation?
View attachment 228907
Farmington CT Police on Twitter
Are you sure he wasn’t convicted? Everyone said he killed her!Prosecutors are human beings and yes they occasionally allow dying defendants to see their families before their imminent deaths. FD has not been convicted of any crime yet so he is not receiving any special privileges that anyone else technically out on bond wouldn’t receive.
And there is also the notion that what FD believes is evidence may not be evidence to prove his innocence at all.need hard facts, proof not just FD’s words
It is absolutely insane to ask a state to waste state resources trying a corpse.
However, NP is welcome to defend the estate in a wrongful death suit against FD if the estate wants to waste their money on incompetent representation.
it doesn’t to me. Also this: Can carbon monoxide-poisoned victims be organ donors?
That’s why it’s important for state now to continue on with this trial without FD to prove he murdered her! To prove she is dead by showing her body, bloody items and everything in between!And there is also the notion that what FD believes is evidence may not be evidence to prove his innocence at all.
Doesn't matter if it happened in the past when FD told him (from my understanding).Past and Future Misbehavior
Discussions of previous acts are generally subject to the attorney-client privilege. If, for example, if a client tells his lawyer that he robbed a bank or lied about assets during a divorce, the lawyer probably can’t disclose the information.
But if a client initiates a communication with a lawyer for the purpose of committing a crime or an act of fraud in the future, the attorney-client privilege typically doesn’t apply. Likewise, most states allow—or require—attorneys to disclose information learned from a client that will prevent death or serious injury. Many have a similar rule where revealing otherwise confidential information would prevent or remedy financial injury due to a crime or fraud.
The Attorney-Client Privilege
suppose he knows something about KM or MT? something that would send them to or save them from prison?
I always hope Dave is reading here so he can see how little respect we have for his "reporting".@MemPat and @LittleBitty, I think DA just "scooped" @LittleBitty earlier quote here??????
Virtually identical.....have to double check the timing.
it doesn’t to me. Also this: Can carbon monoxide-poisoned victims be organ donors?
He didn’t do it. His family did it.
Heller has ordered Herman’s testimony stricken from the record, ruled the hearings as a mistrial, since they were never completed, and required that his report remained sealed. Heller also noted in the order that anyone who reveals or releases the report could face sanctions or contempt of court.
Jennifer Dulos divorce: Judge tosses psych exam that favored Fotis Dulos