CTGrammy
Expert IMO
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2019
- Messages
- 849
- Reaction score
- 10,829
So maybe she didn’t find whatever she was looking for in the first house so now she’s moving onto searching the second... She wants IN the houses. Otherwise they could put that stuff out on the curb. And I wonder about JD’s jewelry she might have had on. MOO.
Since Fd's ankle monitor showed that he was In the Garage, I would be inclined to believe that MT's ankle monitor would also show exactly where she is within any house.
Perhaps this is why she wants to have the monitor removed so that she can 'assist' in her defense by going to Fore properties.
If the monitor is removed, then LE cannot see where she is, or has been, Inside any of the homes and garages and therefore Not learn from where she is retrieving any evidence.
CT Judiciary -- Listen Up.
Do the Right thing and do NOT remove MT's ankle monitor and Do NOT give her any leniency on her home confinement and/or her monetary bond requirements.
Period.
IMO.