Deceased/Not Found CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #51

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
pernickety said:
What Happened to Missing Connecticut Mother Jennifer Dulos?

“At publication time, the cases continue against Dulos’s two co-defendants Troconis and Mawhinney. At some point, they will either enter into a plea agreement or move forward to trial.

Schoenhorn claims that as part of the discovery process, the prosecution gave him more than 100,000 documents, photos and videos, in three separate “document dumps” without an index, a move he calls “a cynical strategy.”

Schoenhorn also says he believes evidence is being withheld that could undermine the state’s theory that a red 2001 Toyota Tacoma owned by one of Fotis Dulos’s employees was used to transport Jennifer Dulos the day of her disappearance.

In response, Colangelo says he had provided all parties with all of the information he has to date: “The state is not in the business of withholding evidence,” he says.

The next scheduled pre-trial hearing in the Troconis case is slated for November 13, 2020.”
Click to expand...

Thanks for finding this article Pernickety. Schoenhorn sounds like Schoenhorn...whiny, windy, and witless.

He laments the hardships of the demure MT....From the article above:

Troconis was initially ordered to home confinement, but in August defense attorney Jon Schoenhorn successfully lobbied for the state to relax those restrictions.

She must remain on GPS monitoring and cannot leave Connecticut without permission, which makes it difficult to see her daughter at school, out of state, Schoenhorn tells A&E Real Crime. He also indicated other limitations: Troconis is an avid water skier, but she must refrain, even when compliantly staying in Connecticut: “They haven’t invented a waterproof GPS tracker.”

He says the state’s stance toward his client has been punitive for someone not convicted of a crime."

I imagine that JFD would love to be on GPS tracking and able to see her children, if she were still alive. Everything is relative....IMO...MOO
 

....He says the state’s stance toward his client has been punitive for someone not convicted of a crime."

Sounds to me as if he is not familiar with the legal system.

Or familiar with Kent Mawhinney, come to think of it. Would ole' Michi rather be incarcerated, waiting? Wouldn't any rational person consider 'house arrest' and GPS monitoring less punitive than incarceration?

BTW who decided the child would attend school in another state? Not me, not you -- while Michelle Troconis likely was involved in that decision.

This Michelle Troconis:

Arrest Warrant for Michelle Troconis

who is also the not-demure Michelle Troconis of the crotch-grab & double-bird images.


jmho ymmv lrr
 
Last edited:
Oh, MT cannot go water skiing
MT cannot go snow skiing
MT cannot go see her daughter
MT cannot go to her daughters school
MT cannot leave Connecticut
MT needs permission to do these things.

That is not to much of a price to be alive and still see her loved ones IF they want to come see her. She can still work. By the MT I want to see your sales for the past year! Did you make a sale or was it all hot air? We’re the transactions in English? I bet they were if you made any sales at all.

Jennifer’s children will never have a choice to see their mom...you took it away from all of them.

Stop whining and act like an adult.
 
@Tink56 - any "new" date on the divorce hearing for KM? I know it's only been 1 day.... :) TIA!
animated-smileys-waving-003.gif
 
MsJosie said:
Can anyone put this in language I and others can understand? Legal talk is confusing! Thank you.
Click to expand...

Interesting find...from a lay person's limited experience and initial reading, IMO, it appears that Weinstein and Dean are closing out the potential taxes on 4JX and removing it from the potential estate of JFD. By paying the amounts due to the state and Farmington, there should be no further taxation on the property. (For instance, it would not be considered part of JFD's probate in CT as the quit claim nullified her interest.)

Someone else who has real estate knowledge should chime in, 'cause thinking one can understand a legal document without a lawyer can get oneself in trouble, eh? :)
 
sds71 said:
More than a year and a half after the disappearance of Jennifer Dulos, state police are now looking for her remains.

"From day one that was our goal—our mission—was to find Jennifer," says Chief State's Attorney Richard Colangelo. "Find her and find out what happened to her for her family; for her children. That’s really what we’re looking for."

The search for Jennifer Dulos continues | fox61.com
Click to expand...
Great article....I so admire the diligence and integrity of Attorney Colangelo.

My favorite quote from the article:
"Anyone that commits a crime, anyone that conspires to commit a crime should be accountable for what they do," says Colangelo. "So while I’m not going to specifically talk about those two individuals, I can say that we have probable cause and we can prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, there’s not a prosecutor in the state that won’t try the case."

Second favorite quote, in which Attorney Colangelo seems to be addressing the family study and its irrelevance to the murder case...Schoenhorn doesn't need to see it!
"During the investigation, I was conscious of not actually delving into the family case," says Colangelo. "I made sure I wanted to focus on the facts and the information that we were getting through our investigation and I didn’t look into any of the family information at all. Because that can be tainted by lawyers and tainted by whatever side someone is on in that argument or divorce proceeding. So, I wanted to make sure anything I presented in court I had the facts to back it up, I was able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt."
 
MsJosie said:
Can anyone put this in language I and others can understand? Legal talk is confusing! Thank you.
Click to expand...

Tink56 said:
Interesting find...from a lay person's limited experience and initial reading, IMO, it appears that Weinstein and Dean are closing out the potential taxes on 4JX and removing it from the potential estate of JFD. By paying the amounts due to the state and Farmington, there should be no further taxation on the property. (For instance, it would not be considered part of JFD's probate in CT as the quit claim nullified her interest.)

Someone else who has real estate knowledge should chime in, 'cause thinking one can understand a legal document without a lawyer can get oneself in trouble, eh? :)
Click to expand...

The purpose of the complaint is to request the court grant the foreclosure of the mortgage deed by BNY Mellon, N.A. at $2,490, 466 for nonpayment after FD stopped paying the mortgage beginning November 2018, and other relief deemed equitable and proper.

The original note principal $2,300,000.

FMV/ appraisal $1,900,000.

In any event, any interest by the estate of FD has been foreclosed out. (Property underwater by substantial deficiency).

Attorney Weinstein's seeks to prevent any potential inchoate liens (i.e., future taxes not yet due) from the town of Farmington, and/or liens from the Department of Revenue Service for potential probate fees against the estate of JD-- in the event that an estate is opened for JD (i.e., if she's declared deceased).

By this complaint, Attorney Weinstein is putting the CT taxing and probate authorities on notice that the mortgage debt found by the court in the foreclosure action far exceeded the appraisal or this was a substantial deficiency judgment.

Nonetheless, since we believe that JD was brutely murdered by FD, I'm not giving Attorney Weinstein a pass for alleging in his complaint that to spare JD the stigma of being named in a foreclosure, GF and her counsel quitclaimed JD's one-half interest in 4 Jefferson Crossing to GF to transfer title of her undivided half-interest, using her POA that JD delegated to her mom.

Spare JD the stigma of being named in a foreclosure, really?

I swear -- with every passing day, I'm convinced every attorney that touches something with either Dulos or Farber's name warrants an investigation of their billings.

If JD is deceased, take note that the quitclaim of JD's interest to the plaintiff would be ineffective because a POA is revoked and/or ceases at death.

SMH... :eek:

MOO
 
Seattle1 said:
The purpose of the complaint is to request the court grant the foreclosure of the mortgage deed by BNY Mellon, N.A. at $2,490, 466 for nonpayment after FD stopped paying the mortgage beginning November 2018, and other relief deemed equitable and proper.

The original note principal $2,300,000.

FMV/ appraisal $1,900,000.

In any event, any interest by the estate of FD has been foreclosed out. (Property underwater by substantial deficiency).

Attorney Weinstein's seeks to prevent any potential inchoate liens (i.e., future taxes not yet due) from the town of Farmington, and/or liens from the Department of Revenue Service for potential probate fees against the estate of JD-- in the event that an estate is opened for JD (i.e., if she's declared deceased).

By this complaint, Attorney Weinstein is putting the CT taxing and probate authorities on notice that the mortgage debt found by the court in the foreclosure action far exceeded the appraisal or this was a substantial deficiency judgment.

Nonetheless, since we believe that JD was brutely murdered by FD, I'm not giving Attorney Weinstein a pass for alleging in his complaint that to spare JD the stigma of being named in a foreclosure, GF and her counsel quitclaimed JD's one-half interest in 4 Jefferson Crossing to GF to transfer title of her undivided half-interest, using her POA that JD delegated to her mom.

Spare JD the stigma of being named in a foreclosure, really?

I swear -- with every passing day, I'm convinced every attorney that touches something with either Dulos or Farber's name warrants an investigation of their billings.

If JD is deceased, take note that the quitclaim of JD's interest to the plaintiff would be ineffective because a POA is revoked and/or ceases at death.

SMH... :eek:

MOO
Click to expand...
Thanks for your analysis. I did wonder, some time back, how the once unclaimed property in JFD's name disappeared from the Sec'y of State's "Biglist"--after JFD's disappearance. And wondered if the state had accepted a POA in order to release it to whomever it was released to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 69 more.
Total: 521 (members: 70, guests: 451)

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
451
Total visitors
521
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,148
Messages
18,235,267
Members
234,301
Latest member
jillolantern
Back
Top