Still Missing CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #61

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
He went back to ask about mitrochondral dna because the lady from the lab who said its a barrell of garbage was insistant it was nuclear dna or not. He said any dna right before ending and she gave him a look as if he didnt know anything . Js didnt know the difference imo. He looked it up and is asking this one about it.( back to the blue striped shirt)
Thats my opinion of it.
The state is finally objecting!
 
State -- two different kits. Both valid.

JS: objects

Judge refers to the form of testimony.... sustained.


Sticky side of tape
2 contributors -- 780,000x more likely, MT
And Jennifer 100 billion x

JS objects

Judge says that cross covered the likelihood rations so overruled

Is it uncommon to have small amounts of DNA? No, we can develop profiles from very small amount 20 to 30 pg.

She cannot say how or when a sample got on a surface.
 
State asks about the hair on the sponge.

PG not excluded as the source of the DNA.

State asks hypothetical -- if someone used that sponge to clean PG's truck, coukd it had picked up that hair?

JS objects. No evidence that sponge was used.

Judge says it's fair.

She says, yes, that could happen.

State asks if it's true that all PG was eliminated from all the items from Hartford.

Objection. Judge says State can ask tge question differently.

State asks it differently. Of the list of items, PG was eliminated from every profile? Eliminated or inconclusive but no positive associations.
 
State asking about the cutting from the seat. It wasn't tested, why?

Witness says it had already been tested by KM so per protocol, they don't want to do additional screening tests o order to preserve a limited sample so it's sent for confirmatory DNA testing.

end re-direct
 
Re- cross --

JS: Regardless of the ratio, it's still 3 cells? Yes

JS asks about the hair.

Witness says MT was eliminated from that item.

JS asks about PG and a doorknob in NC.

Objection, outside the scope, sustained
 
After that quick sidebar that prosecution requested, then court adjourned for the day, I got a feeling that the state was maybe telling the judge that they didn’t want to break up the testimony from their next witness that would be long….just a guess…but maybe PG?

The prosecution just essentially eliminated him from that testing.
 
MOO

JS really wants to distance MT from her DNA on the tape and bag.

First she could have touched him in the Raptor. Secondary transfer.

Then she could have inadvertently touched the next bag while removing a bag while inside cleanity cleaning.

Then because he understands mitochondrial DNA like a 5th grader, maybe the daughter or mother touched the bag when they were cleaning so it's not MT at all....

And that's why there's such a teeny tiny bit of nanopicomichi.

Yes, but what's more probable?

MOO
 
MOO

JS really wants to distance MT from her DNA on the tape and bag.

First she could have touched him in the Raptor. Secondary transfer.

Then she could have inadvertently touched the next bag while removing a bag while inside cleanity cleaning.

Then because he understands mitochondrial DNA like a 5th grader, maybe the daughter or mother touched the bag when they were cleaning so it's not MT at all....

And that's why there's such a teeny tiny bit of nanopicomichi.

Yes, but what's more probable?

MOO
But didn’t he also say that MT had no idea what was in the bags and truck was loaded by FD?

I’m confused?
 
I will need a summary chart
Item Description
Number
Name of DNA contributor
(I don’t care about the billions of likely-hood, if it’s theirs, it’s theirs).
If nothing found, can leave it off the list.

P.S.
Hating JS for saying “blouse” and “brassiere” - we are not talking about his grandma in 1970!!! it’s disrespectful and sexist old fashioned creep talk.
 
I will need a summary chart
Item Description
Number
Name of DNA contributor
(I don’t care about the billions of likely-hood, if it’s theirs, it’s theirs).
If nothing found, can leave it off the list.

P.S.
Hating JS for saying “blouse” and “brassiere” - we are not talking about his grandma in 1970!!! it’s disrespectful and sexist old fashioned creep talk.
Here's the arrest affidavit for KM. A good refresher. P. 4 and P. 8 are perfect summary charts!

 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240205_142418_Drive.jpg
    Screenshot_20240205_142418_Drive.jpg
    121 KB · Views: 43
  • Screenshot_20240205_142401_Drive.jpg
    Screenshot_20240205_142401_Drive.jpg
    103.4 KB · Views: 41
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
78
Guests online
229
Total visitors
307

Forum statistics

Threads
609,772
Messages
18,257,767
Members
234,757
Latest member
Kezzie
Back
Top