I know, but if this gets to trial, they only have to convince one juror
But, to repeat what we all know, that don't mean a hill o' beans as far as getting him off the hook for murder.
I have no idea why they (guilty peeps) don't just plead guilty and get it done with.
I find it curious and hilarious that the defense wants to pin the tail on JW, but it's not JW's DNA at the crime scene and elsewhere. :thinking: I wonder why the defense isn't arguing DNA? Has anything be said about DNA so far?
I just don't get why bring anybody else into this at all? Not a damn thing will make a difference exonerate DW or prove he wasn't there and didn't do anything. No defense witnesses? Oh, this is just so frustrating to be wasting all this time and taxpayer resources to play "what if" in court.