IDK. Mutilation is a pretty strong word. A different word from torture even. The posts that I saw were believable, IMO. Not necessarily true but they sounded sincere. I believe that the posters DID hear that info. It may have been true or not. Also, the media often does not dwell on truly awful things. Maybe a representative for the S family asked media not to repeat the info. In most MSM AS injuries were reported as lacerations but a few MSM articles were much more descriptive. I think DW, and if there were others involved, wanted to terrorize SS. A lot of people say the focus was PS but I don't think I agree. He was a means to an end, IMO. This crime was so sick, it's beyond comprehension
bbm
I agree with you, I never thought PS was the focus, either. A means to control the adults.
I disagree, the msm reports details on all kinds of depraved, disgusting, heartbreaking and unimaginable atrocities to infants, babies, toddlers, children, adults and the elderly and the resulting devastating injuries. I regret even having to repeat that, but it is true. While I agree that sometimes, some details are often made public only during or after a trial, there are plenty of msm organizations that report on the details at the time and before, during and after trial if there is one. Some of the more gruesome details are left to online versions of msm news reports, but not on tv from a reporter's mouth that I can recall seeing or hearing - just online. I can't even imagine a reporter saying those things out loud. I also can't imagine how a doctor or MedEx has to testify in spoken word about them.
I didn't use the word mutilation originally, just repeating what another poster used. A stab through the eye would constitute mutilation for me, but not a stab in the arm, chest, abdomen, etc. Yes, I agree that torture can be different from mutilation; what was said in the blog comment was mutilation.
I never knew that msm would honor a request from anyone other than LE to print or not print something if it was true. No sarcasm. I do know they pull things that aren't true, invalidate any integrity they might have, or precipitate legal action against them. As we see, it's practically impossible to scrub things online. In Jessica Chambers' murder, people were wizards with retrieving scrubbed social media. LOL, the old days when papers had to print a retraction or correction; online just makes it as if it never was. We've always been at war with Europa. yeeks. No wonder we go nuts trying to find information we know we saw, but can no longer find. I swear, I have to remember to take actual screenshots instead of just bookmarking. Some articles I do remember to pdf at the moment - yay!
As disgusting as this thought is: I believe DW's intelligence has been underestimated. :/ He had the same capabilities and opportunities to research and learn as we did to know how to do these things. Being a psycho doesn't equate to subpar intelligence.