I'm not certain precisely how it works, but I would think the first call after 911 received the notification that SS's house was on fire and dispatched the firemen, was for 911 authorities to attempt to contact the homeowners, either SS or AS, or both? Being unable to reach them, maybe they had AIW contact info and contacted AIW next? IDK.
But switching gears a bit, I've been thinking about the red bag situation. Something from the PH doesn't make sense to me.
Below is taken from pages 30-35 of PH:
Q=Ago
A=Owens
Q: The employee, according to W-1, then took the money
from his pockets and put it in W-1's bag; is that right?
A: That's correct.
Q: Now W-1 described his bag as a red bag; is that
right?
A: Yeah.
Q: At some point W-1 texted a photograph inside of a red bag to a witness numbered as
A: Yeah.
Q: And the police never recovered any -- never found any bag containing red lining in that car; is that correct?
A: Not to my knowledge, no.
Q: No red bag at all?
A: No.
Q: The only thing in terms of a bag recovered from W-1's car was a black backpack, correct?A: Yes.
Q: Have you asked W-1 what happened to the red bag?
BACH: Your Honor, objection.
COURT: You can answer that yes or no.
A: No.
Q: When I say you, I mean the police, not you personally. So your answer the same?
A: Yeah.
I thought the SW revealed there were two backpacks recovered from the car? A black one and an orange one?