I don't buy that either. This is all about greed and not revenge. He hasn't even worked for AIW for 10 years.
IT yes, as in it and not he/she. jmo
just in case....lol.....
so IT is W-1?
I just read this and was about to post it myself. W-1 has to mean Witness 1? But what does IT stand for? Are those initials of the courier? Anybody?
so IT is W-1?
Agree W-1: Witness 1
IT: thinking an employee
...when IT received the money from the other employee
Would think at least two employees involved
Confused
Then why did he show up 5 years later at AIW armed with a machete?
Paul Wagner @Fox5Wagner · 4m 4 minutes ago
Breaking: Court affidavit says Daron Wint and "others" were involved in the murders of the Savopoulos family and their housekeeper.
W-1 admitted he lied.. IT instead of he.Can't be. Their stories didn't match, hence "W-1 admitted IT lied..."
I think W-1 is the courier, based on the final statement attached to the #449 post in this thread.
I am confused about this. I have a hard time following police reports when they say W-1, etc. Who is W-1? Is W-1 the same person in all of the reports, or is W-1 the actual person and is used for all people involved? Who is IT? I think that just reads weird, I assume they are initials...but IT reads like it. LOL!!
Maybe I am just not following this correctly???
W-1 admitted he lied.. IT instead of he.
As detectives continued to question W-1, he changed his account of the events regarding how he received the package, where he left the package and when he was told to get the package. When he was questioned about a text he had received from Mr. Savopoulos on Wednesday May 13, 2015, W-1 changed his statement.
This text was addressed to W-1 and the text directed him to meet the other employee on Thursday morning in Hyattsville to pick up the package. After being shown the text, W-1 admitted the text was accurate and he made a mistake about he was first told to get the package. W-1 was also questioned about what the money was contained in when he received the money from the other employee. W-1 admitted that he had lied when he stated the money was in a manila envelope when he received the money from the other employee.
W-1 stated what actually happened was the other employee took four bundles of money from the employees pockets and placed the money in a red bag which belonged to W-1. W-1 then drove to Mr. Savopolous house
I put the wrong pic in, sorry!
https://twitter.com/CBSNLive/status/601823584806371328/photo/1