Skigirl
Verified expert in neuroscience & psychology
- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 5,783
- Reaction score
- 15,722
Here's what we seem to know(corrections appreciated.)
He was happy at his former job but subsequently fired.
He is involved in a very expensive sport and planned to attend two pricey events this summer.
Neither SS or his company is listed as a sponsor.
Being Director of Marketing, appearing in ad photos in previous job...becomes driving a rich guy to work and back.
He knows welding.
He likes SS's cars.
DW is apprehended with a truck that is a mobile auto/truck repair service.
He's lied to police about certain key facts.
He dropped off the money but never checked that the boss got it..thereby covering his own derrière.
The last call was from SS phone to him.
All of this could mean NOTHING. And that is a likely possibility. But I ask again, how often in the charging document for a different person, does LE refers to lies by someone completely different? Is that common? I honestly don't know.
His father lived a few hundred yards from where the Porsche was torched.