"Talk to me!"
Discussions on Formal Sentencing Hearing - Jodi Arias #3
- Thread starter LambChop
- Start date
- Status
Whatever better be done by 11 pm, for sure! :dance:
wenwe4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 9,499
- Reaction score
- 7,359
Upthread someone reposted that JAII had removed the jurors names from their site. I am sure this was probably discussed earlier (as it was a post in the 600's on this thread) but that is not true - I just checked. In fact they have reposted the jurors names and numbers (it's on there twice). I'm curious if they find out who leaked the list.
I think I read somewhere they couldn't request cellmates, and they intentionally rotated them out periodically. That may have been for Estrella though.
You crack me up! :giggle:
I thought 'ol Angie was on Death Row. Am I wrong? And what are the chances of JA running into Marissa D. in the general population?
They must not think there's any legal action that can be taken against them. Maybe there isn't, I don't know.
Good question. I thought she was a lifer. Didn't she plead out? No trial?
Edit: yep; http://murderpedia.org/female.S/s/simpson-angela.htm
mydirtysecret
Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2014
- Messages
- 933
- Reaction score
- 2
Simpson is a lifer. She was just like, yeah i did It. Snitches wind up in ditches. I'm not going to give you a sad story. Buh bye
Iirc, she had pled and expected DP but got LWOP/LWP?, anyway, she seemed to be very aware that there's only one way she's likely to leave.
wendiesan
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 3,362
- Reaction score
- 10
JMO, but it doesn't matter what was in the juror's head. What matters is that she did not disclose to the "judge", and the prosecution, that she had changed her stance on the death penalty and could not state under what circumstances it should be applied (the DT already was well aware of this, IMO). It appears that she was in contact with people who had an interest in the outcome of the trial--MdlR in particular. (So now we know what MdlR kept texting and twittering about during the trial. And maybe what JA was telling her.) Juror #17 may have been in contact with Sandy Arias (hence her comment "We have it" before the jury returned to the court). She may have been in contact with JW as well.
As well Juror #17, ie. SC, refused to discuss the case with other jurors. She was not fulfilling her job as juror. She brought into the jury room the content of a Lifetime movie about JA. She was, in effect, contaminating the deliberations by bringing in information that was not part of any of the phases of the trial. In other words, isn't it possible that Juror #17's actions could be seen as tampering with the jury? It doesn't matter what she was thinking--it could have been a nice payoff from the Enquirer, it could have been TV interviews, it could be that she had a tectonic shift in her philosophy regarding the death penalty. It doesn't matter. It is what she did, her actions, her behaviour, her words that should be reviewed and judged.
JMO, but after what she did, both KN and JW owe #17 a ton of free legal services. so if #17 was prosecuted on any charge, her defence shouldn't cost the taxpayers of Arizona a cent!
She's pretty much opposite JA in every way, except the psychopath part. I don't see a fast friendship.
Interesting article. However, I did notice the murdered inmates were all male. Besides the obvious (JA is a murderous female) I don't think she is as likely as a male prisoner to be murdered. JMO.
I'm thinkin' I need to re-watch her interview and remind myself that JA may very well run into her. Can you imagine?
In fact, she may want to teach JA all about real abuse. "See Jodi, I'm starting my own prison program, thanks for the idea."
Yeh actually I looked for reports of violent behavior in Perryville as well and couldn't find anything much in MSM. There's a few blogs but I don't think they're linkable and mainly about abuse from guards and poor conditions.
I have to admit I am interested in how Jodi will cope with prison. For one I would like to reassure myself that it isn't going to be easy and I don't think it will be. Another reason though is that she's such a strange character. She seems to live in her own world and have the ability to escape into her own head and believe her version of reality. I wonder if this will change in the prison environment or if it will get worse.
I think it will get worse until a certain breaking point then I don't know how she will react to facing real reality.
I guess I'm just nosey and for the sake of the family of Travis I hope she will go quietly.
FelicityLemon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2015
- Messages
- 3,302
- Reaction score
- 5,970
I recently learned how to do 'screenshot' - find out how to do those - it's addicting because you can do it soooo quickly! Downside (for me on Mac) is that I have to go back and individually open each one to name it something recognizable so I can find it again, lol!
Also, don't forget you can screenshot Google Cache things, too
I recently learned how to do 'screenshot' - find out how to do those - it's addicting because you can do it soooo quickly! Downside (for me on Mac) is that I have to go back and individually open each one to name it something recognizable so I can find it again, lol!
Also, don't forget you can screenshot Google Cache things, too
LOL.....it took me about a year on here before I could even figure out how to post. I went ahead and took pics of the pages with my cell phone but then somebody on here threw out the "don't want to get subpoenaed" thing so I will just end up deleting them. Should learn how to do the screen shot thing anyway though.....
wendiesan
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 3,362
- Reaction score
- 10
While the talk has shifted to JA being sent behind bars, I'm wondering what will happen to the DT.
Since much of the *advertiser censored* testimony in the penalty phase was, IIRC, establishing grounds for the DT to appeal the guilty verdict, will KN press on?
Could this happen in the thirty days before the sentencing "deadline" of April 13?
If KN wins this, will JA be walking around free while waiting for the retrial of the original sentence?
Will the trial that never ends have yet another phase?
The convolutions of this trial could easily form the plotline of a soap opera titled (with apologies to Carol Burnett) As The Stomach Churns.
Since much of the *advertiser censored* testimony in the penalty phase was, IIRC, establishing grounds for the DT to appeal the guilty verdict, will KN press on?
Could this happen in the thirty days before the sentencing "deadline" of April 13?
If KN wins this, will JA be walking around free while waiting for the retrial of the original sentence?
Will the trial that never ends have yet another phase?
The convolutions of this trial could easily form the plotline of a soap opera titled (with apologies to Carol Burnett) As The Stomach Churns.
Now I am wondering if JA didn't allocate because they knew juror 17's intention. It didn't make sense at the time, but now it does. No reason to give a fake apology in public. I thought I would feel better when this all ended, but the way this went down is not a relief at all.
mydirtysecret
Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2014
- Messages
- 933
- Reaction score
- 2
I really believe the people she has aligned herself with has fed into her narcissism. Her delusions become grander and more unrealistic as time goes on. I believe partly because she's in an information bubble and relies on her circle almost entirely to tell her what's going on. I have like you always been intrigued at her level of delusion she lives entirely in her own version of reality that doesn't exist. Its bizarre
- Status