daisydomino
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2014
- Messages
- 1,355
- Reaction score
- 2
I think JSS did not read this part carefully enough....
"One court found proper grounds for removing a deliberating juror refusing to deliberate include: a jurors unwillingness to engage in the deliberative process (not willing to participate in discussions with fellow jurors by listening to their views and by
expressing his or her own views; expressing a fixed conclusion at the beginning of deliberations and refusing to consider other points of view; refusing to speak to other jurors; attempting to separate oneself physically from the other jurors).
"
Sounds to me that is exactly what was going on and sounds to me JSS had every right to remove her and use an alternate.
No, she asked them again and they said things were better.