Conversely, it would be easy for a inmate to hold up a piece of paper (such as a list of juror names) and allow the video visitor to take a screen shot of it.
GREAT point! Makes perfect sense. Wonder if it can be proven (if that's how the names were relayed) given that Sheriff Joe doesn't record the calls?
Makes me wonder what else she might have passed along. She had access to EVERYTHING when she went pro se the second time.
An aside.....Sheriff Joe says he has copies of all her ingoing and outgoing correspondence. Why didn't JSS ask to see this information when deciding whether or not to seal court for JA's testimony?
She could have disproved the DT's claims of threats to JA with one phone call to Sheriff Joe (or via video chat if she splurged and paid $5).