Thank you. The post shall stand as written.I do!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_Mason_(TV_series) hehehe I checked and JB is NOT Perry Mason!
next case!
Thank you. The post shall stand as written.I do!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_Mason_(TV_series) hehehe I checked and JB is NOT Perry Mason!
She is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law by a jury of her peers.
HOWEVER, this thread is asking for opinions.
What a horrible visual, JB in G-String!!
do you have a link for that?
I do!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_Mason_(TV_series) hehehe I checked and JB is NOT Perry Mason!
I do!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_Mason_(TV_series) hehehe I checked and JB is NOT Perry Mason!
I do!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_Mason_(TV_series) hehehe I checked and JB is NOT Perry Mason!
You are right. Nobody can understand that but again there has been no trial and the information that is being put out to the public is being done for a reason. No one really knows what will come out on the defense side that might turn this thing all upside down. Just my thoughts
:floorlaugh:It appears that this thread is unraveling as we speak. Maybe the defense will resort to covering up.
Howdy! Doesn't make any difference how long you've been registered for your opinion to have any more weight as anyone else's. I apologize on behalf of those who want to make you feel otherwise. I welcome you too!
Interesting counterpoint to that Jamie Floyd and other TH's. No way do I disagree with "innocent until proven guilty" -- absolutely! But in context ... if I'm the judge in the trial or sitting on the jury in the trial. Other than that, all bets are off.
Fact: I'm in Seattle, I'm not a judge, and not a citizen of the state of Florida.
I don't believe that the presumption of innocence iregarding KC applies to me. Especially on a message board.
She'll be toast, because she should be.
That being said, I've often wondered if I could set aside all that I know and the opinions I've formed to judge her unbiasedly and listen to the evidence presented on both sides. I'd like to think so. Maybe I give myself too much credit, but I've never been in the position to assess.
Not that I'm proposing professional jurors (inside WS joke, well not a joke to some ).
Thank goodness.. Perry always wins.. lol
Her actions have convinced me that she is guilty. I can't see how a mother would not be crying and totally depressed.
Possibly she has to do that to allow her defense team to gather the information needed to prove another theory and her silence and lies are her only hope of obtaining the information.
Unless they can lay the blame WITH strong enough evidence on another member of the A fam...there will be no "upside down" at trial. The forensic evidence won't support a stranger scenario, imo. They won't get anywhere with a jury if they are trying to sell a SODDI defense.Originally Posted by Interested57
You are right. Nobody can understand that but again there has been no trial and the information that is being put out to the public is being done for a reason. No one really knows what will come out on the defense side that might turn this thing all upside down. Just my thoughts
Everyone acts differently and also is coached by legal staff on how to act.
Everyone acts differently and also is coached by legal staff on how to act.