Dr. Teresa Sievers - Motives and Theories (Including MS speculation)

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
What exactly did MS ever do for work?LPN?Casino card dealer?

What was his appeal to a brilliant doctor?

**Perhaps** he put on a bit of Psycopathic charm, donned his best stethoscope & "played his cards right".......maybe he even had an (tongue in cheek) "ace in the hole"!????

:shame:
 
**Perhaps** he put on a bit of Psycopathic charm, donned his best stethoscope & "played his cards right".......maybe he even had an (tongue in cheek) "ace in the hole"!

:shame:

You said it way better than I did!!
 
If all of that is true, yes it does look bad for him. In order to believe all of that is true, we would have to believe the verified poster. Am I right or is there another reason we think there was a dr. friend?

Do you mean Skinner? Do you think he's lying about MS saying he called a doc friend to check on TS? Or do you think MS was lying to him? Sorry, Me Confused.
 
TS and her ex hubby stayed in contact for years per his words. So maybe MS felt like she was cheating even if she wasn't. Jmo

I wonder if he is the jealous type. I guess anyone can be the jealous type under the right circumstances. But some people get cray.

ETA: Case in point, the Kendra case!
 
Do you mean Skinner? Do you think he's lying about MS saying he called a doc friend to check on TS? Or do you think MS was lying to him? Sorry, Me Confused.

Don't necessarily think either. Just pointing out you would have to believe him to believe everything that's been speculated about this doctor friend.
 
ok .PESKY did it for me......excellent . I also think CWW has cultivated a recent look to appear from a distance to be MS...PLANNED FOR A LONG TIME....EVIL
 
ok .PESKY did it for me......excellent . I also think CWW has cultivated a recent look to appear from a distance to be MS...PLANNED FOR A LONG TIME....EVIL

That picture of him with the big goofy smile. Where did that come from?
 
Sorry, I thought you were talking about neighbors who post here, since you mentioned that you wished they would become verified. I misunderstood. :)

Well, I only said it would be nice if they would. It would make what they have to say more legit (maybe credible was the wrong word), the way my mind works at least.... Don't make fun of me... i know my mind works different than most :)

For clarity - we don't verify locals, including neighbors. They are welcome to post their observations, photos of the area, etc... It is what it is. The majority of our cases have an active following of those local to the area, especially true of those that are fairly high profile. (For example, right now our registrations are blowing up with Canadian locals following the Hailey Dunbar case.)

We only verify insiders who have a personal relationship with either the victim, perp, or other person directly related to the case. That usually means a relative, friend, teacher, co-worker, etc... (and in TS's case, includes patients.).

Oh, and of course we verify anyone posting in a professional capacity - attorneys, RN's, SAR, pathologists, etc...
 
Don't necessarily think either. Just pointing out you would have to believe him to believe everything that's been speculated about this doctor friend.

I disagree. This is why - most of what Skinner posted were his personal impressions, feelings, thoughts and experiences he personally formed as a result of being a longtime friend of MS. Anything he shared regarding the specifics of Teresa's murder was Skinner relaying to us what he had been told by Mark. Clearly, HE believes his friend. I believe that Skinner believes Mark...or at the very least, wants to believe him. Doesn't mean I believe Mark was being truthful with Skinner though.
 
That picture of him with the big goofy smile. Where did that come from?

I'm not positive but I think it was his Facebook profile photo before it went dark. Maybe someone saved a copy and can confirm.
 
I think he was a real smooth operator.....lots of talk.....big ambition. After they got married and had children, she prob. figured out he was ALL talk.
 
I disagree. This is why - most of what Skinner posted were his personal impressions, feelings, thoughts and experiences he personally formed as a result of being a longtime friend of MS. Anything he shared regarding the specifics of Teresa's murder was Skinner relaying to us what he had been told by Mark. Clearly, HE believes his friend. I believe that Skinner believes Mark...or at the very least, wants to believe him. Doesn't mean I believe Mark was being truthful with Skinner though.

Right, but this is where we heard about MS calling a doctor isn't it?
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/20/h...advocate-for-alternative-treatments-dies.html

Not sure how to link, so I hope this will work. I'm not a conspiracy theorist by any means, but it sure does seem like so many alternative medicine doctors are dying recently.

This story just won't go away will it... Hmmmm.....
(Wrong thread though ;) )

ETA - actually, have a read through this article . This Dr. had a very similar mindset to TS. If I were into judging people, this is the type of guy I would expect her to be married to. JMO
 
Right, but this is where we heard about MS calling a doctor isn't it?


CORRECT.

I believe Skinner was actually told this by MS.

Did MS lie to Skinner we shall see won't we?

Perhaps when CWW arrives in Florida and the Sunshine Law goes into effect, we might just get a few more facts on that 911 call. If LE holds it back then we know it is pretty darn significant to the case.
 
Right, but this is where we heard about MS calling a doctor isn't it?

To my knowledge, yes, it is. I know we've had discussion about TS being pronounced dead at the scene, however that could have been from the coroner.

I tend to believe that a doctor was the one Mark called to go over to the house initially, but that is just my opinion based a number of things I have surmised. For one, I can't think of a reason Mark would lie to Skinner about that particular fact because Mark is keenly aware that the identity of the person who discovered her body is going to be public knowledge as soon as the 911 tape is released, if not before.
 
To my knowledge, yes, it is. I know we've had discussion about TS being pronounced dead at the scene, however that could have been from the coroner.

I tend to believe that a doctor was the one Mark called to go over to the house initially, but that is just my opinion based a number of things I have surmised. For one, I can't think of a reason Mark would lie to Skinner about that particular fact because Mark is keenly aware that the identity of the person who discovered her body is going to be public knowledge as soon as the 911 tape is released, if not before.

Then I don't understand what you disagree with. That's what I said. If you believe there was a doctor friend then you have to believe theory Skinner told. It is the only source of info we have giving us this piece of information.
 
Then I don't understand what you disagree with. That's what I said. If you believe there was a doctor friend then you have to believe theory Skinner told. It is the only source if info we have giving us this piece of information.

June 29, 2015 9:00 - 9:45 am has the honor of being the only timeline entry entered twice. Once for the MSM version and once for the Skinner version.
6/29/2015 - 9:00-9:45 - unknown person sent on welfare check to Jarvis Rd. Dr. Sievers found deceased. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/07/02/teresa-sievers-dead-florida_n_7716476.html
6/29/2015 - 9:00-9:45 - RHHC staff calls MS who calls a doctor friend to go to the home and investigate. http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...rs-46-***READ-ONLY***&p=12030150#post12030150

Posted that way, so what has been published in MSM can be discussed and linked. And until LE releases information, sleuthing the identity of the person that Mark sent on this errand as said to his friend, Skinner, who relayed it to us isn't discussable. So source links available for either version and one can believe them both. IMO.

I think we are all in agreement.

Link to timeline: http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...line-Dr-Teresa-Sievers-**MINIMAL-DISCUSSION**
 
With TS dead. CW would have been able to get closer to a fragile MS and take his identity and empty his bank accounts and run up his credit without him noticing anything for a long time or enough time.

Maybe some of the things in MS name was actually opened up by CW. Idk. Maybe CW couldn't have carte blanch to MS finances since TS shared those accounts as well.

I could see CW trying to get business loans and credit cards in MS name without having any intent to pay it back.

Ole Charles Merritt is believed to have attempted something similar with the McStays.
 
Then I don't understand what you disagree with. That's what I said. If you believe there was a doctor friend then you have to believe theory Skinner told. It is the only source if info we have giving us this piece of information.

First, I owe you an apology because apparently I misinterpreted what you were referencing when you said "then you have to believe the theory Skinner told". The word "theory" was what threw me off. Honestly, I'm still unclear about what encompasses "Skinner's theory". If you meant he sent a doctor friend over to check on TS, then, yes, we agree. However, anything else that Skinner theorized based on his communication with Mark (e.g., "Mark said he is innocent of any wrongdoing), I'm not buying that.

I believe Skinner is a loyal friend who wants to believe the best in Mark and desperately wants to believe he is completely innocent of any wrong doing. However, if Skinner has known Mark as long as he claims and was such a close confidant, then I also believe he is aware that Mark has a darker side. Even if he believes that "dark side" is part of Mark's past and he has since repented and reformed. I don't believe he was forthcoming about that side because it would hurt his friend. And, in defense of Skinner, he had no obligation to disclose that to us. In short, I think Skinner painted the picture he desperately wants to believe and wants US to see. And to do that effectively, that meant omitting some of the shady areas.

I'm going to learn not to post when I haven't backread far enough. Again, I apologize for the confusion. I hope this post hasn't confused it even more. lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
172
Guests online
2,280
Total visitors
2,452

Forum statistics

Threads
600,417
Messages
18,108,414
Members
230,991
Latest member
Clue Keeper
Back
Top