A raffle and selling tshirts and ribbons.Certain people did not attend, in my opinion, because media would be asking questions.
The money collected is coming from people who can not afford to be giving it away.I thought I read the funeral was being offered for free from a funeral home.This is exactly what I was talking about earlier, I am sure all funds will be funneled directly to those who shall not be named....I had a hard time not looking at all the kids there and wondering what any of them may be going through themselves.
I felt sorry for the father even while I watched him driving around smoking a blunt. Now the only ones I feel sorry for are the foster\real family and Jordan. NO ONE ELSE. Give the new baby to them.
I believe it is.The money collected is coming from people who can not afford to be giving it away.I thought I read the funeral was being offered for free from a funeral home.
I think LE will be watching this group and their activities.Reminds me so much of Haleigh Cummings family and look where they are now.I felt sorry for the father even while I watched him driving around smoking a blunt. Now the only ones I feel sorry for are the foster\real family and Jordan. NO ONE ELSE. Give the new baby to them.
At least in this case all the evidence points directly at mom. In cases where a boyfriend/father was in the house it can get complicated when trying to prove who did what.CS' attorney will probably suggest that LE interrogation was improper and that she was forced into a confession, or something along those lines
More at the link. So the state receives funds for permanently placing a child within 24 hours and family reunification is the easiest way to achieve that goal. FWIW, the more cases I follow here the more I believe that in the majority of them reunification is the worst option. JMOO.[Foster care advocate] Going believes the system favors reunification because it's the easiest way to achieve permanent placement goals.
The federal government says children in the foster care system should be placed permanently within 24 months.
“There is a number that needs to be met for that in order for a state to be receiving federal funds,” Going said.
...
Authorities took Jordan away from his parents shortly after his birth in 2016 over drugs, gang activity and domestic violence in his home.
But on July 16 of this year, a Pinellas circuit court judge signed a permanent custody order returning Jordan to his parents at the recommendation of child welfare agencies.
That order was signed two days after his father was arrested for allegedly battering his mother in Jordan's presence.
I don't know, @imstilla.grandma but it sure is good to see you. I hope you are well.I can’t believe I watched that entire thing. I’m still wondering what I watched. What in tarnation was that?
Yeah.. that’s it!I believe it is.
My guess is the family is so distraught they can’t go out and look for work.
Yes it does.I think LE will be watching this group and their activities.Reminds me so much of Haleigh Cummings family and look where they are now.
Yeah, I hate that for them. When my husband died, I had maybe 2 minutes to think ahead to his children.I believe it is.
My guess is the family is so distraught they can’t go out and look for work.
More at the link. So the state receives funds for permanently placing a child within 24 hours and family reunification is the easiest way to achieve that goal. FWIW, the more cases I follow here the more I believe that in the majority of them reunification is the worst option. JMOO.
Foster care advocate says agencies made errors in returning 2-year-old Largo boy to unstable parents
So now that I have seen the reports that made them rip that baby out of that loving home and returned him to that cesspool I think I am going to puke in my trash can.Guardian objected to Largo boy being reunited with mother
Published: September 6, 2018
Updated: September 6, 2018 at 09:05 PM
LARGO — Five months before Jordan Belliveau was found dead, the person tasked with advocating for his best interests told a magistrate that the toddler should not be returned to his mother.
Her objection was overruled.
[...]
The more details emerge about the boy’s short life, the clearer his extensive involvement with the complex child welfare system becomes, raising questions about why he was returned to his parents and how he fell through the cracks. Even as Jordan’s guardian ad litem fought against his return to his mother out of foster care, records show, a case manager for a state contractor pushed for the boy to be given back to Stinson.
[...]
In April, almost a year and a half into foster care, a court considered whether Jordan should be returned to Stinson.
According to court records, child welfare workers inspected and approved Stinson’s home.
But the child’s guardian ad litem raised another concern: there was no documentation Stinson had been going to counseling. While Stinson testified that she had been going since November 2017, neither the guardian nor child welfare workers obtained the records. Still, the guardian’s objection about the process was overruled by a magistrate overseeing the case. The magistrate’s name was not listed in the report beyond an indecipherable signature.
Mother and son were reunited on May 31, and father and son not long after on June 11.
"No evidence was presented to show that the circumstances that caused the out-of-home placement have not been remedied to the extent that the return of the child to the mother’s care with an in-home safety plan ... will not be detrimental to the child’s safety," the court order says.
[...]