rsd1200
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2016
- Messages
- 11,477
- Reaction score
- 30,748
The instances you mention (but for the tower shooter) arent mass shootings, tbih.
Someone in charge needs to start hammering out a definition and staying with it, because a single student is one too many:
Starting in 2008, the FBI limited its definition of mass shootings to a single incident in which a shooter kills four or more people, according to the criminologist Frederic Lemieux, writing in the Chicago Tribune. But in 2013 the agency decided to rely on a definition for an active shooter instead of narrowing in on a definition of mass shootings; it defined an active shooter as a person actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area. This active shooter definition includes incidents in which fewer than four people die. The definition change makes historical study of the issue especially complicated given the variation in what counted as a mass shooting before 2008 and what counts now. Further complicating matters is that, after the 2012 shootings in Newtown, Connecticut, Congress officially definedmass killings as three or more killings in a single incident. Twenty schoolchildren were among those murdered in that attack.
[FONT="] [/FONT]
Connecticut Democratic Senator Chris Murphy, who was in office at the time of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook elementary school, said to Congress in a floor speech Wednesday: We are responsible for a level of mass atrocity that happens in this country with zero parallel anywhere else. As a parent, it scares me to death that this body doesn't take seriously the safety of my children, and it seems like a lot of parents in South Florida are going to be asking that same question later today.
https://www.theatlantic.com/educati...ther-school-shootingbut-whos-counting/553412/