JanetElaine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,961
- Reaction score
- 4,023
I added it, sorry
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
Much appreciated, thank you.
I added it, sorry
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
..no kidding. the tan malibu had the Tag # 78NHD, per the AA , while the black malibu had the Tag # MAW068. per the criminal complaint. ..no wonder nothing was found when the tan coloured one was found.....it wasn't the one ..the complaint states that once the black malibu broke down, JG then switched to a GMC Safari-----is that the white van we heard of earlier on?Pausing to say---- BLACK Chevy Malibu??????????? I thouoght the Amber Alert said Tan!!!!
Wonder why only that one had a date and the other two don't.It only says the last one is from December, the other ones give no date description so could be more recent.
Wonder why only that one had a date and the other two don't.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
..no kidding. the tan malibu had the Tag # 78NHD, per the AA , while the black malibu had the Tag # MAW068. per the criminal complaint. ..no wonder nothing was found when the tan coloured one was found.....it wasn't the one ..the complaint states that once the black malibu broke down, JG then switched to a GMC Safari-----is that the white van we heard of earlier on?
Wonder why only that one had a date and the other two don't.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
..thanks, it's definitely mind boggling that an out of work labourer had access to numerous vehicles.Yes I think the GMC Safari is the white van. My cousin had one. Where did he get all of these cars from? Is there it a ring?
I still can't imagine that she was able to act completely normal, knowing she would be sneaking out of the house in the middle of the night. Like I said, I can tell when my little boy is sneaking a snack! Their innocent and truthful faces usually tell something is up. But, that's just me.
http://www.winknews.com/2016/06/06/...se-faces-child-*advertiser censored*-charges/
This doesn't add up. If the phone was locked, how was he able to receive a call from Jorge on it telling him to keep it?
I would imagine the child *advertiser censored* found on his phone was more akin to trophy shots. The hand was his and the female body parts were most likely Diana's.
My guess would be the pics were taken last Sunday morning, on 5/29. He thought tossing the phone out the window would eliminate the evidence. He probably tossed it after the phone call from the parents asking him if he had seen their daughter. That was an unexpected glitch in his plan, since he planned on burning them up in their sleep.
They've got him locked up now on a No Bail, so he's going to be sitting right there until further notice.
LE is going to have to find her now......that's really all that's left. It's simply a waiting game at this point.
I don't know what kind of phone, but when my i-phone is locked, I can answer an incoming without unlocking it. But after I hang up it is locked again and I cannot use it without putting in the code.
I don't think it was Diana he talked to in the house. I still think there's another adult involved.
I don't think he tossed the phone. I think he lost it while he was leaving her. If he had todsed it, he wouldn't have called to find out where he was.
I still think he's a pawn.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If DA used stepdads phone to contact JG the night she was abducted wouldn't this have been a slam dunk from the minute they knew she was missing? I doubt she took the phone with her. When the family woke up and she was gone and they called LE they would see the calls and/or texts she sent right? Not a huge mystery there if there are communications with JG or even a burner phone after 2 am and before 7 am.
Maybe I need to go back and re read all the new info but please if there's just something I'm not getting help me.
IMO of course
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk