ToodieWorm
New Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2014
- Messages
- 99
- Reaction score
- 0
My point was that as an adult, you are responsible for yourself. You can choose to react to setbacks, mental illness, bad childhoods, etc., by blaming everyone but yourself.
Getting drunk and taking pain pills, chain smoking and laying in bed for 7 weeks is not a great way to choose to live. Julie was an affluent woman--she had so very many other options than destroying her children.
And mental illness, even schizophrenia, is not an excuse for murder. She was more than able to hold it together to buy the weapons. Mental illness doesn't come and go. Was she shaking and suffering Tardive dyskinesia at Lock & Load? When she was writing her "journals?" Nope.
She bought hollow points. And we only have Julie's version of what her kids were like. She may have been horribly abusive to them, refusing to parent, being verbally abusive & ranting about their father for all we know.
Teens talking back to their parents is hardly a crime punishable by a point blank gunshot to the face and head. With bullets designed to blow your face off. Are you kidding me?!
Bottom line: Julie decided not to avail herself of the many, many, many other choices she had as a woman with money. She chose to shoot her children in the face and head and rub it in her husband's face.
JMO
With all due respect, I think you are saying this from the viewpoint of a rationally thinking person. Please don't mistake, I am not sticking up for her. I just think that it is hard to say She should have recognized her faults when many mentally ill don't see them themselves. The alcohol might have made her feel "normal" as normal could be when the medicine made her foggy.
Just thoughts