GUILTY FL - Dan Markel, 41, FSU law professor, Tallahassee, 18 July 2014 - #3 *Arrests*

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Her rambling about the TV makes absolutely no sense. First she says CA bought her the TV "this morning." Then by the afternoon it's already broken and she's having a repair man there and they had a conversation about "which would be cheaper?" Of course it's cheaper to just return the TV because you just bought it and it's defective! Who gets a repairman out for a brand new TV?? She's trying to create some kind of alibi for something, I just can't figure out what. Maybe the killers did show up at her house??

Also, quite a coincidence that her brother would be joking about hiring a hit man, and she'd be joking about it with a repair man, on the very day her husband was killed.....by a hit man.

Wish we could see the entire video.
 
[video=youtube;7-fEYuoB3NI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-fEYuoB3NI[/video]

Wendi on a game show in her younger days.
 
[video=youtube;7-fEYuoB3NI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-fEYuoB3NI[/video]

Wendi on a game show in her younger days.

Interesting find Russian Blue, but holy foreshadowing - WA and the"competition", are referred to as" black widows", WA gets the correct answer for movie "Ghost" and then game host talks about "sudden death"!
But... in the end Wendi wins the money!
imo.
 
Her rambling about the TV makes absolutely no sense. First she says CA bought her the TV "this morning." Then by the afternoon it's already broken and she's having a repair man there and they had a conversation about "which would be cheaper?" Of course it's cheaper to just return the TV because you just bought it and it's defective! Who gets a repairman out for a brand new TV?? She's trying to create some kind of alibi for something, I just can't figure out what. Maybe the killers did show up at her house??

Also, quite a coincidence that her brother would be joking about hiring a hit man, and she'd be joking about it with a repair man, on the very day her husband was killed.....by a hit man.

Wish we could see the entire video.
I think they're going to release things in dribs and drabs. A nice little cat and mouse exercise. One that is going to cause each of the Adelsons to spend a nice chunk of money. Much more than WA ever argued about with Dan.

Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
 
Not to mention I didn't even know tv's could still be repaired these days.
Also, the more I reread her recount of her brother's "joke" it doesn't make any sense as a joke to me. It's a bit of a non sequitur.

Great points - you're so totally right here.
 
Not to mention I didn't even know tv's could still be repaired these days.
Also, the more I reread her recount of her brother's "joke" it doesn't make any sense as a joke to me. It's a bit of a non sequitur.

I can see it as a joke brother makes to sister during messy divorce. But perhaps he brought it up again during a phone call that morning to try to give her a subtle warning/prepare her for what was going to happen, and his words were preying on her mind, so she blurted it out. I think the 'TV repairman' is maybe code for sleepover boyfriend, someone that she didn't want to involve, that she had discussed the joke with that same day.

I don't think she definitely knew, I don't think she has the fortitude or ruthlessness, but she's the type who will refuse to believe her family could do it. See no evil, etc.
 
My thoughts on why Wendi knew beforehand:

WA's whole life has been a series of precise and calculated moves so why wouldn't she be involved? Valedictorian, Cambridge, a research fellowship at Carnegie Endowment and law school. She married Dan so she "could cheat the system by marrying a man I lacked passionate love for because ‘Hey, didn’t that die anyway during marriage?’ I saw his intellect and big heart and thought he would make a wonderful father for my children." Her exit strategy from the marriage was the most covert and calculated of them all.

I'm not buying that her family would make this enormous and permanent move on her behalf without her buy-in. The impact being so severe and life-changing for her and those little children. Putting a spotlight on them forever. It may not have been her idea initially. Dan pushed her to the edge with the 'unclean hands' accusation and must have been difficult to know of Dan's deepening relationship with Ms. Adler, a very accomplished, sophisticated, attractive and connected woman living in NYC. LE made a point to let us know that WA was googling the hell of her.All the while, Wendi is trapped in Tallahassee in a relationship she did not see going to the next level, according to what her camp told Above the Law. Man, that boyfriend must have seen some evil there. Breakups are tough, but I don't think my exes would proactively reach out to the police saying they should consider me as a suspect for a brutal crime. That's pretty telling.

Dan turned the tables and was winning the race of the exes. That race being defined as who can be happy first by truly moving on. Simultaneously, legally he was raking her over the coals according to those court documents, pinning her on every move- fairly or unfairly. Their marriage and battle afterwards was quite competitive don't you think? Her words were "being married to someone that didn’t view me as an equal."

Why is Wendi telling the TV technician the divorce joke? Cause she was consumed and hung up on the nastiness of her divorce telling anyone who will listen. Perhaps she did not know the precise timing of the hit? Maybe her family kept those details from her so she had the element of surprise for reaction purposes?

Regarding the efficacy of the police interview, I have seen similar footage from Dateline where the guilty are informed by police and sincerely act distraught.

My thoughts on Katherine Magnabua and Charlie Adelson:

My opinion is that it was a fling initially. He whetted her appetite with the finer things in life. Was helpful in getting her a new job through his connections. I disagree with Above the Law inferring that the murder was in the "early stages of their relationship" and therefore less plausible they'd conspire. If they started dating from late 2013 and crime was July 2014, then 6-8 months of dating is sufficient for me. All that had to happen was for CA to say "I have this problem" and for KM to say "I have a violent gang member baby daddy who I could trust with that. He owes me money for child support, and I could use new breasts."

I bet KM initially told him that CA was not a serious boyfriend, or a not boyfriend at all, to get him to oblige to the deed. Garcia probably got agitated that CA and KM were STILL dating months after the murder, leaving a huge connection out in the open. A career criminal might be annoyed by that -- uh, yeah. Some jealousy peppered in too of course.
 
I can see it as a joke brother makes to sister during messy divorce. But perhaps he brought it up again during a phone call that morning to try to give her a subtle warning/prepare her for what was going to happen, and his words were preying on her mind, so she blurted it out. I think the 'TV repairman' is maybe code for sleepover boyfriend, someone that she didn't want to involve, that she had discussed the joke with that same day.

I don't think she definitely knew, I don't think she has the fortitude or ruthlessness, but she's the type who will refuse to believe her family could do it. See no evil, etc.

I guess it's possible, but I still can't wrap my brain around a brother doing this without informing his sister. I mean, it's not like her life was in danger from her ex or something. The only reason I can think that CA would possibly do it without WA's knowledge is if Dan, the attorney, was about to expose something illegal in the dental practice (finance related) and he had to be stopped.
 
I can see it as a joke brother makes to sister during messy divorce. But perhaps he brought it up again during a phone call that morning to try to give her a subtle warning/prepare her for what was going to happen, and his words were preying on her mind, so she blurted it out. I think the 'TV repairman' is maybe code for sleepover boyfriend, someone that she didn't want to involve, that she had discussed the joke with that same day.

I don't think she definitely knew, I don't think she has the fortitude or ruthlessness, but she's the type who will refuse to believe her family could do it. See no evil, etc.
No fortitude or ruthlessness? Her running away from Tallahassee with boys in tow, furniture removed and moved to Miami, and safe emptied, divorce all laid out all while Dan was gone for 2 days smacks of extreme fortitude. Not only that but she essentially hid the boys for 6 weeks, so Dan couldn't communicate with them. I'd say that was ruthless. I believe she continues this act of "helplessness" as it serves her purpose. But many are on to her now just as Dan was.

Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
 
No fortitude or ruthlessness? Her running away from Tallahassee with boys in tow, furniture removed and moved to Miami, and safe emptied, divorce all laid out all while Dan was gone for 2 days smacks of extreme fortitude. Not only that but she essentially hid the boys for 6 weeks, so Dan couldn't communicate with them. I'd say that was ruthless. I believe she continues this act of "helplessness" as it serves her purpose. But many are on to her now just as Dan was.

Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk

I think that was engineered by her family, a strong woman wouldn't 1. Have run away, but would have confronted her husband about their marital problems and 2. Not gone home to Mummy and Daddy and Big Brother, but dealt with her life independently.

I think,in particular, if she'd been a equal co-conspirator she wouldn't have referred to her brother as soon as the officer asked who might have done this on her behalf.
 
I think that was engineered by her family, a strong woman wouldn't 1. Have run away, but would have confronted her husband about their marital problems and 2. Not gone home to Mummy and Daddy and Big Brother, but dealt with her life independently.

I think,in particular, if she'd been a equal co-conspirator she wouldn't have referred to her brother as soon as the officer asked who might have done this on her behalf.
Yes, I agree with you. But I still think she gets what she wants, when she wants it.

It's unfortunate that her emotional maturity didn't
evolve with everything else
she possessed.

JMO

Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
 
Rivera's docket indicates that he's filed motions to incur additional costs in connection with hiring a private investigator and "mitigation specialist," presumably to fight the death penalty. The court appears to have granted both motions. Possible that he's cooperating despite all this?

Rivera not talking?

According to filed court documents, it appears that Rivera's attorning has filed a notice of depositions to take place on 9/20. Details reveal that it's to depose 4 TPD officers and a State's Attorney investigator. The notice also states that the depositions will be taken for the purpose of discovery and use for evidence at trial. This does not bode well for the hope of a plea deal. However, as far as I know, his whereabouts are still unknown.
 
Her rambling about the TV makes absolutely no sense. First she says CA bought her the TV "this morning." Then by the afternoon it's already broken and she's having a repair man there and they had a conversation about "which would be cheaper?" Of course it's cheaper to just return the TV because you just bought it and it's defective! Who gets a repairman out for a brand new TV?? She's trying to create some kind of alibi for something, I just can't figure out what. Maybe the killers did show up at her house??

Also, quite a coincidence that her brother would be joking about hiring a hit man, and she'd be joking about it with a repair man, on the very day her husband was killed.....by a hit man.

Wish we could see the entire video.

This seems like a terrible attempt at reverse psychology. "If I tell openly tell him my brother was talking about hiring a hit man, he'll assume my brother would never hire a hit man." Maybe the officer trapped her with an earlier question and she panicked and tried to in-artfully deflect the accusations.

In any event, it doesn't seem that WA really cared. As others mentioned, she seems most concerned about herself in the video. Of course, there's the infamous audio from her class in which she makes light of the situation. Plus, there were those recent photos of her hanging around with big bro for a night on the town, which I find most disturbing: Your brother was joking about a hiring a hit man; Dan was rubbed out by a hit man; the hit man (men) has direct ties to your brother, and you're still on speaking with term with him?

IMO, she probably knew what was going on, but at the very least it doesn't really bother her - except to the degree it has made her life more difficult.
 
Why, after this police interview with WA, was CA not also questioned?
 
Why, after this police interview with WA, was CA not also questioned?
Really. Or her parents. Were they "afraid to touch them" or did they decide to save them for a rainy day?

Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
 
Why, after this police interview with WA, was CA not also questioned?

Really. Or her parents. Were they "afraid to touch them" or did they decide to save them for a rainy day?
CA and parents probably refused to cooperate with any questioning by LE. Guilty or innocent, that’s a wise decision. I’m certain the A’s attorneys would agree.
 
CA and parents probably refused to cooperate with any questioning by LE. Guilty or innocent, that’s a wise decision. I’m certain the A’s attorneys would agree.
Yes, I guess so. I wonder if they knew their daughter "implicated" them?

Sent from my SM-G386T using Tapatalk
 
CA and parents probably refused to cooperate with any questioning by LE. Guilty or innocent, that’s a wise decision. I’m certain the A’s attorneys would agree.

Why did WA cooperate and (apparently) without a lawyer present?
 
Why did WA cooperate and (apparently) without a lawyer present?
Why did WA cooperate with LE on the afternoon of the murder?
I think she was in a psychological perspective of auto-pilot behavior.
I would like to know what happened prior to WA arriving at the police station and entering that interview room.
I think LE told WA something so worrisome that WA’s Lawyer Hat wasn’t even nearby. I think WA didn’t ‘think’. She simply reacted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
123
Guests online
1,767
Total visitors
1,890

Forum statistics

Threads
605,607
Messages
18,189,640
Members
233,462
Latest member
HatsDom
Back
Top