Where or what was that? Can anyone provide a link, please?I vote for @vislaw's presentation!
Where or what was that? Can anyone provide a link, please?I vote for @vislaw's presentation!
On this page: VERDICT WATCH - FL - Dan Markel, 41, FSU Law Professor, Tallahassee, 18 July 2014 - #8 *arrests*Where or what was that? Can anyone provide a link, please?
This Juror said it was 9-3 on KM's guilt. The 3 were all females - one was age 20-30, the other three were in a different age group. She sounds like a SJW.
The juror sounded legit to me. JMO.
Wow. This juror is not bright...
The juror sounded legit to me. JMO.
Out of all the jurors on the panel. Mentour comes up with the dud.The juror sounded legit to me. JMO.
He responded to you, Peke, and said he's going to try to get an interview with a juror who thought KM was guilty.
The juror sounded legit to me. JMO.
Wow. This juror is not bright...
This Juror said it was 9-3 on KM's guilt. The 3 were all females - one was age 20-30, the other three were in a different age group. She sounds like a SJW.
Thank God 2/3's of the Jury had enough common sense to render the correct verdict. They bought the Defense closing argument and decided on their emotions instead of the facts and law in front of them. Still, a 9-3 outcome doesn't look good for KM at this point as the State gets another "bite at the apple" Now we can see why the Prosecution is moving very cautiously in their pursuit of CA and his high powered lawyers.Was just able to finish watching these videos and I completely agree--she's a SJW. How in the world was she allowed on a DP qualified jury? Wondering if she lied to get on the case.
Out of all the jurors on the panel. Mentour comes up with the dud.
Thank God 2/3's of the Jury had enough common sense to render the correct verdict. They bought the Defense closing argument and decided on their emotions instead of the facts and law in front of them. Still, a 9-3 outcome doesn't look good for KM at this point as the State gets another "bite at the apple" Now we can see why the Prosecution is moving very cautiously in their pursuit of CA and his high powered lawyers.
Did she mention Dan Markel at all? Seems like she identified more with KM.Haha there were jurors that were biased against bottle girls? What a great observation. Thats what she gets from the evidence. The more this idiot talks the less I believe she lives in the same universe that I do. And she is trying to instruct on reasonable doubt? It seems this whole trial was nothing more than a big joke to her....insert more laughs and giggles. I can't listen to much more of her drivel.
Did she mention Dan Markel at all? Seems like she identified more with KM.
This has been a problem before and agree that it will be again.Man, I'm very worried about future jury selection - not just for this case, but for all of humanity.
The interviewed juror seems to view KM through her identity group and oppression status.
As the juror views the trial through the lens of GC's white privilege, the juror sees any challenging questioning of KM as further oppression and justification for acquittal.
That's just nuts.
KM took the money. She was the conduit.
But, she could have worked a few more bottle hour shifts instead.
Or, she could have used her college education (a privilege that so few people that have ever existed on this planet have experienced) to raise herself up out of oppression.
I'm thinking that the AG's office must find a black or Hispanic female prosecutor for next time.
Just imagine what that juror would have thought had Juan Martinez been the prosecutor.
In a re-trial the State will have the time to hone in on this and tighten up its arguments about the mountain of circumstantial evidence in this case. Also hopefully they can winnow out jurors who don't understand the significance of circumstantial evidence. JMO.A commenter on the videos had a good point that this could be a case of the 20-30 crowd and the CSI phenomenon (paraphrasing). They can't accept that circumstantial evidence is still evidence.
Florida State Law should be amended to read all hung juries votes shall be polled at the end of trial.I only heard her one time mention DM's kids being without a father. There was a lot more compassion for Katie than for Danny.
When the jury came back with a guilty verdict for SG it was all over but the crying for KM and she cried. He knows her role. It's just a matter of time and patience by the State. SG/KM will crack and we will know exactly when they do as CA will be in custody shortly thereafter.