GUILTY FL - Dan Markel, 41, FSU Law Professor, Tallahassee, 18 July 2014 - #9 *arrests*

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
You don't know the half of it, my sister teases her teen gkids with patty. They are really disturbed by her. The kids insist she put her away when they visit, but sis brings her out when they least expect it. Like when they are asleep she will stand her at the end of the bed(she's tall) and take a photo to show them in the morning.
This is too funny. I am only 5'2" and I noted the size of the doll. That would be very very creepy.

My mother has 3 sisters and they were all terrorized by my oldest aunt that made up an imaginary person named ZEKE. The aunt that I am closest to is still traumatized to this day. She is also the one that introduced me to true crime. I read her Ted Bundy book in my preteens. Scared me to death. I knew at an early age what people are capable of.....did keep me safe and aware.
 
is WA Fifty's Helen of Troy ?

Lol. No. I just don't think she was involved in the planning or execution of her ex husband's murder, for many reasons that I think the evidence strongly supports, when viewed objectively!

Also I was with her when she found out about the arrests and I know her personality and character. And likewise, I have a long career of working with intelligence and law enforcement and I'm confident in my anti-bamboozaling skillset. :)
 
Since you said speculate in my own opinion and imagination, here goes.....


I have no facts, just observations from looking into the eyes of the accused and the deceased and what I feel. First I took a look at Dan and saw honest emotion shining for all to see. Next I looked deep into Garcia and all that resonated was sadness. What I saw from Rivera was cold, hard and unfeeling. Katherine showed not one bit of sadness or remorse and it seemed she was showing strength. Finally Wendi. I was overwhelmed at the manipulation emanating from her. Her smugness, her cunning, her detachment. Deflecting suspicion elsewhere and offering up diversions that leave her blameless and oh so innocent. I'm not falling for it, she is the ONE that benefited from all this. I intentionally left out ma, pa, and brother but they also played their devious part and without their heartless involvement and money Dan would still be here. Wendi, with her influence and emotional exploitation maneuvered her family to get on board and finance this evil deed. And Katherine was more than willing to get on the money train and possibly even suggested providing the means to eliminate Dan. The means being Garcia, who in turn recruited Rivera. You can see where I'm going with this and I know it goes against all the evidence presented so far, but that evidence mainly comes from the mouth of Rivera, who I suspect actually pulled the trigger. Garcia is taking the fall since he was the one that recruited Rivera to make the hit and he is doing his best to protect Katherine the mother of his children. Katherine has kept quiet and sat in jail for three years because she can't implicate Rivera without dire consequences. In my opinion there is no other reason she would not come clean and tell all. She fears for her life and that of her family.
Witness protection....
 
Lol. No. I just don't think she was involved in the planning or execution of her ex husband's murder, for many reasons that I think the evidence strongly supports, when viewed objectively!

Also I was with her when she found out about the arrests and I know her personality and character. And likewise, I have a long career of working with intelligence and law enforcement and I'm confident in my anti-bamboozaling skillset. :)

You seem genuine and I do appreciate your views even if they contrast with mine. You also appear to be an independent and critical thinker. Having said that, what do you make of her disregarding what the world can see and raising her sons under the wings of those who allegedly (based on a load of evidence and no other explainable link to the convicted killers) executed their other loving parent. I mean, as far as character goes, not a good look.
 
Last edited:
Lol. No. I just don't think she was involved in the planning or execution of her ex husband's murder, for many reasons that I think the evidence strongly supports, when viewed objectively!

Also I was with her when she found out about the arrests and I know her personality and character. And likewise, I have a long career of working with intelligence and law enforcement and I'm confident in my anti-bamboozaling skillset. :)
Ok how did she act after the arrests? Do you care to expound? All my LE and professional psycho analytical pals say she is cold and hated DM. I know it is conjecture. I for one feel she had no foreknowledge but definitely knew ex post facto.
 
Lol. No. I just don't think she was involved in the planning or execution of her ex husband's murder, for many reasons that I think the evidence strongly supports, when viewed objectively!

Also I was with her when she found out about the arrests and I know her personality and character. And likewise, I have a long career of working with intelligence and law enforcement and I'm confident in my anti-bamboozaling skillset. :)

Hi Fifty. Were Wendy's responses during trial 100% truthful?
 
Lol. No. I just don't think she was involved in the planning or execution of her ex husband's murder, for many reasons that I think the evidence strongly supports, when viewed objectively!

Also I was with her when she found out about the arrests and I know her personality and character. And likewise, I have a long career of working with intelligence and law enforcement and I'm confident in my anti-bamboozaling skillset. :)

So you're saying she was relieved about the arrest?
 
You seem genuine and I do appreciate your views even if they contrast with mine. You also appear to be an independent and critical thinker. Having said that, what do you make of her disregarding what the world can see and raising her sons under the wings of those who allegedly (based on a load of evidence and no other explainable link to the convicted killers) executed their other loving parent. I mean, as far as character goes, not a good look.

Good question. I recently unfriended someone who was arrested for animal cruelty.
 
If a big part of the problems in the marriage had to do with DM's deep involvement in his religion and his desire for his boys to be raised to eat Kosher food only, why did WA and DM marry one another?
The food at the wedding was not Kosher, why was this done if many of (presumably Dan's) guests were Kosher?
speculation, imo.
 
Hi @FIFTY

It appears you know at least one of the players in this case. I would strongly encourage you to become a verified insider. All items stated as facts on WS must be backed up with an (approved) link, however, if you become a VI you may state knowledge and observations without providing a link and then our members can choose whether they consider the information to be accurate or not.

If you would like to add yourself as an expert in a certain field or as an insider to a case, please send an email to wsverify@gmail.com

If you do not wish to be identified as an expert in a certain area, we ask that you refrain from answering questions that are specifically directed to those that have been verified as specialist in their area and that you do not claim to be a professional in any area.

If a member posts with "expertise" please check to make sure they are on this list. If not, please do not take their post as professional information, but rather just as another opinion; much as you would with any member of the general posting membership.

Locals who are describing the area or are members of the gyms and that sort of thing do not need to be verified.

We only verify people who know the players or have been named in the media, etc. This does not include people who may befriend a player on internet social media and then wish to post about it.

If a member wants to post as a professional (a lawyer, shrink, and so on) or as a local/knows the people involved then they must email us at the following email: wsverify@gmail.com

Please include:

The case
Your Websleuths name
Your phone number and a good time to call
Your real name
Location (City and State)
In the subject line please put your user name and which case you are asking to be verified on

All info will be kept strictly confidential.

Thank you
 
Juror Interview - Part 1 - Dan Markel's Murder Trial - State vs. Garcia and Magbanua
Mentour Lawyer


Thanks, I listened. And I subscribed. Not much on this first one and the sound was terrible, but he asked her about jury makeup and what questions the jurors maybe should have been asked beforehand. I think. I'm listening again.
 
Thanks, I listened. And I subscribed. Not much on this first one and the sound was terrible, but he asked her about jury makeup and what questions the jurors maybe should have been asked beforehand. I think. I'm listening again.

Yeah. Talking about jury selection in Part 1. Part 1 not that juicy. I want to hear about deliberations. I had to use earphones to hear, but the sound got better towards the end. This series will give us great insight into what went on in that Jury Room.
 
This juror does say she thinks an important question that should have been asked of potential jurors was if anyone had gone through a contentious divorce with custody issues. That question was not asked.
 
Yeah. Talking about jury selection in Part 1. Part 1 not that juicy. I want to hear about deliberations. I had to use earphones to hear, but the sound got better towards the end. This series will give us great insight into what went on in that Jury Room.

Yes, earbuds are a must!! This juror is a college-educated woman, 20-30, and is a mom. That's all she divulged of herself. To me, she sounds white.

ETA: She said Mr. Z. asked questions mostly about circumstantial vs. hard evidence and how the jurors felt about mercy. GC asked, in many different ways, how jurors felt about the death penalty.
 
Here's a question I have of all female jurors - either in this case or any other..... What do you do about having to go #2 during the day if you have to, since all jurors use the potty together!? We all know this is a no-no for ladies....we need our privacy and try hard to be the only one in a public restroom when the need presents! And there were so many female jurors!
 
Well the recent trial/news coverage has gotten some people riled up. The Adelson Institute for Aesthetics & Implant Dentistry YELP reviews has this big disclaimer on it.

vigilante@2x.yelp-react-component-consumer-alert.yji-be6ee8b3977d93711477d8cbc79f078b.png
Unusual Activity Alert
This business recently made waves in the news, which often means people come to this page to post their views on the news.

While we don’t take a stand one way or the other when it comes to this news event, we work to verify that the content you see here reflects personal consumer experiences with the business rather than the news itself. As a result, we’ve temporarily disabled the posting of content to this page.

You should feel free to post your thoughts about the recent media coverage for this business on Yelp Talk at any time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
145
Guests online
1,605
Total visitors
1,750

Forum statistics

Threads
602,559
Messages
18,142,542
Members
231,436
Latest member
Quantum-Dark
Back
Top