My "intuition" told me to go to Facebook. An odd comment on August 9th. hmmmmm
And on August 13.
My "intuition" told me to go to Facebook. An odd comment on August 9th. hmmmmm
There has been some confusion as to who found Dr. S. but see text and links below:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...er-two-murdered-Florida-home-family-away.html
Police visited the home on Jarvis Road, owned by Teresa and Mark Sievers, after dispatchers received a call raising concern for Sievers's whereabouts at 9.45am Monday.
The welfare-check call from from staff at Sievers' Estero office who became concerned that she didn't show up to work, despite having scheduled appointments.
http://m.nydailynews.com/news/crime/fla-doctor-laid-rest-found-murdered-home-article-1.2283403
When she failed to come into work the next morning her body was found by an unidentified individual who then called 911 at around 9:45 a.m., the sheriff’s department said.
Do not have links but recall that an employee who was interviewed on MSM went to the house but LE was already at the scene. IMO the office called LE who went to the house and found TS deceased. Perhaps the wording from the LCSO report about being called in reference to a deceased female was incorrect if this chronology is accurate. Any thoughts on this?
That's been one of my questions all along - how could the first incident be listed as "reference to a deceased female" unless someone else had already found Dr Sievers deceased? Also, why would the initial call have a higher incident number than the incident showing it had been turned over to another agency? It's all very confusing IMHO.
Occured Date | Incident Type | Address | City | Disposition | Incident Number |
2015-06-29 09:43:24 | DEATH INVEST | 27034 JARVIS RD | BONITA SPRINGS | TURNED OVER TO OTHER AGENCY | 15-268297 |
2015-06-29 09:43:24 | DEATH INVEST | 27034 JARVIS RD | BONITA SPRINGS | REPORT TAKEN | 15-268513 |
There are two Incident Numbers reflected on LCSO website for the DEATH INVESTIGATION at 27034 JARVIS RD on 06-29-2015 at 09:43:24.
My thoughts.... but I have no idea how LCSO assigns Incident Numbers: The initial Incident Number assigned was 15-268297. Disposition on this incident number is listed on LCSO website as TURNED OVER TO OTHER AGENCY. I think this incident was likely closed at the date and time it was 'turned over to other agency'.
The other Incident Number 15-268513 (higher number) was assigned after it was determined the case would be TURNED OVER TO OTHER AGENCY. Any detail obtained after the case was 'turned over to other agency' would be logged in this separate Incident Number.
This way, LCSO knows exactly the data that was TURNED OVER TO OTHER AGENCY at the date and time of the disposition to this other agency because all of that data would be in the first Incident Number 15-268297.
Occured Date Incident Type Address City Disposition Incident Number 2015-06-29 09:43:24 DEATH INVEST 27034 JARVIS RD BONITA SPRINGS TURNED OVER TO OTHER AGENCY 15-268297 2015-06-29 09:43:24 DEATH INVEST 27034 JARVIS RD BONITA SPRINGS REPORT TAKEN 15-268513
http://www.sheriffleefl.org/main/ind...vis&yt0=Search
There are two Incident Numbers reflected on LCSO website for the DEATH INVESTIGATION at 27034 JARVIS RD on 06-29-2015 at 09:43:24.
My thoughts.... but I have no idea how LCSO assigns Incident Numbers: The initial Incident Number assigned was 15-268297. Disposition on this incident number is listed on LCSO website as TURNED OVER TO OTHER AGENCY. I think this incident was likely closed at the date and time it was 'turned over to other agency'.
The other Incident Number 15-268513 (higher number) was assigned after it was determined the case would be TURNED OVER TO OTHER AGENCY. Any detail obtained after the case was 'turned over to other agency' would be logged in this separate Incident Number 15-268513.
This way, LCSO knows exactly the data that was TURNED OVER TO OTHER AGENCY at the date and time of the disposition to this other agency because all of that data would be in the first Incident Number 15-268297.
Occured Date Incident Type Address City Disposition Incident Number 2015-06-29 09:43:24 DEATH INVEST 27034 JARVIS RD BONITA SPRINGS TURNED OVER TO OTHER AGENCY 15-268297 2015-06-29 09:43:24 DEATH INVEST 27034 JARVIS RD BONITA SPRINGS REPORT TAKEN 15-268513
http://www.sheriffleefl.org/main/ind...vis&yt0=Search
JMO - I think "disposition: turned over to other agency" means LSCO handed over the case to an other agency (FDLE?). The sheriff has referred to LSCO as an "agency" before, and the use of the word "other" makes me think that LSCO is distinguishing itself from the "other agency". If the Major Crimes Unit consists of homicide detectives working for (paid by) LCSO, they are not working for a separate state agency. There would be no "turning over" to a specialized unit within the agency.
Isn't this case in the LSCO jurisdiction? The Sheriff's department wouldn't hand over their case to another agency I wouldn't think. What they normally do is the Sheriff or whomever is over the local jurisdiction where the crime occurs has jurisdictional control of the case but may call the state agency (FLDE in this case) to assist but not take over the investigation. The same way if the FBI enters a case. They aren't the lead agency in control but assist the law enforcement agency who is.
IMO
NIN..... yes, I did notice the sl and tl in front of the 268297. What's up with that I wonder. I too remember something in that early interview with an office staff person about going to the house finding LE already there BUT how confusing as to who found her deceased body?! Looks like one account says an 'unidentified' person or individual found her? Huh?
So there may not be an arrest anytime soon. If ever. jmo.