Love the summary! I wouldn’t be able to compress and articulate this case as you have! I’ve been dying to bring this up so figure this is a good spot to do that. WA is a seasoned, very accomplished liar. When she lies she looks at you (the questioner) straight in the eyes, barely blinking. I can hear her inner congratulatory I’m so convincing. With the head tilt. Miss innocent, someone referred to her as a pretty robot with head tilting as the reset lol.
Huge example for me … it’s in KM/SG trial that GC brings up the derogatory name “Jibbers”. (She says it was not derogatory but never referred to him that way directly). The judge asks WA how do you spell Jibbers. WA turns to look at him, looking a little puzzled like he’s stumped here there a little (insert eye roll emoji) and says, looking directly at the judge, wtte hmm I don’t really know. I’ve never written it. I guess you could spell it with a J or a G. In comes GC who says (paraphrasing) Miss Adelson, DM was programmed into your phone as JIBBERS. WA looks directly at GC, and with for eyes says “that’s right”. Very matter of factly like she didn’t just get caught lying. Pregnant pause by GC to let that hopefully sink in to the jury. I’ve watched that whole Jibbers exchange several times and the ease in which WA lies… there is nothing behind those doe eyes… it’s frankly chilling to me. So creepy.