Same exception used by Bryon Laundries parents regarding the murder of Gabby Petito.very interesting, would like to know more about the Florida exception
Same exception used by Bryon Laundries parents regarding the murder of Gabby Petito.very interesting, would like to know more about the Florida exception
Surprisingly, conflict two (which is arguably not waivable) which could impugn Rashbaum (if he encouraged DA to leave the jurisdiction) was not even mentioned in this article explaining Judge Everetts examination of Donna.Great summary STAMPLEWIE!
...am attaching link to video. (She looks stronger than ever.)
Conflict one: DR already defended CA?Donna Adelson Speaks in Court
Donna Adelson testifies that her defense attorney, Daniel Rashbaum, will not present a conflict of interest for her.www.courttv.com
Conflict two: DR can not be atty and witness in same trial?
Right. In my opinion they need to sort this out now.Apologies if anyone already mentioned this but if Rash is called as a witness in DA's trial, he would not be able to represent DA as her attorney.
The argument I can see against this would turn in the fact that she accepted the call from the jail, which has a disclaimer that you are being recorded. It's not the jail's fault she didn't hang up properly.Right. In my opinion they need to sort this out now. Also, i haven’t seen anyone raise the possibility that Dan might move to exclude the hot mic call, on the grounds that Donna did not know she was being recorded, and Florida requires both parties on a recorded call to consent. Not saying it would work, but he could try. The call wouldn’t come in, so he wouldn’t be able to be called as a witness about it.
It was a key part of the PCA for her arrest. I really doubt it will work plus what IAMShadow just posted, I think it's classed as public comms, which is why they were able to be FOIA'd too and we got to hear themRight. In my opinion they need to sort this out now. Also, i haven’t seen anyone raise the possibility that Dan might move to exclude the hot mic call, on the grounds that Donna did not know she was being recorded, and Florida requires both parties on a recorded call to consent. Not saying it would work, but he could try. The call wouldn’t come in, so he wouldn’t be able to be called as a witness about it.
I think this makes sense. BUT, the state did wait to introduce the text to Dan, and they did wait to introduce a lot of Donna’s texts. It seems to me like you could have made a similar argument six months ago regarding why the state had not yet arrested Donna, and whether they felt they had enough to do so. Arguably, however, they might not have intended to arrest Donna and the flight might have forced their hand. So, who knows? We have to wait and see.
And that wasn’t event the truth, that she broke up with him after Yoga because she spoke to him Tuesday when she suggested she was locked out of her house. That wasn’t mentioned at the last trial.I remember the case of an American killed in Bali. And the cousin of the killer (over 8,000 miles away at the time) was convicted of "encouraging a murder" and sentenced to 9 years in prison, in the United States. Apparently there is a special Federal law in regards to killing an American abroad. DM was a Canadian citizen right? I wonder if Canada also has a far reaching similar law? Ugh I really messed up this post...I know there are never "identical circumstances" but/and this could be an interesting stretch at best?
Hello and Welcome GOINGROGUE!!
*** WA was also very interested in JL's travel plans. WA couldn't provide a straight forward answer for the last time she saw DM,. ...Talked in circles for minutes. But when Det. Isom asked when she broke up with JL she instantly replies, "Monday night after yoga." At what point does someone scream "enough of the coincidences!" Uh...just needed to get that off my chest... I'll back out of the room now...anyone need coffee?
Since Rashbaum is familiar with the case and (I would assume) has already reviewed and catalogued the evidence, I think it might be less expensive for DA to retain him as her lawyer and then hire a local co-counsel. I know the Adelson's are wealthy, but Charlie's trial had to take a lot out of the family coiffures. Might not be any defense $$$ left by the time they get to Harvey and Wendi.
And that wasn’t event the truth, that she broke up with him after Yoga because she spoke to him Tuesday when she suggested she was locked out of her house. That wasn’t mentioned at the last trial.
He's been the family attorney for 7 years, helping with their financial legal issues. But wouldn't there need to be some signed document and contract that states DR is now representing DA in regards to the murder of DM? He's trying to imply she had engaged him before any charges had been laid.He's claiming he was her attorney at that stage. Too late to edit
I think Rashbaum has simply told her to sit there and STFU.What an incredible change in DA we saw today. Perhaps she is so relieved to not be waiting to be arrested that she can actually listen to good sense, and act upon such. She's not falling apart, she's getting stronger. I can hardly believe the change, in such a short time and under these circumstances.
' Wendi! You need to give the performance of your life'What an incredible change in DA we saw today. Perhaps she is so relieved to not be waiting to be arrested that she can actually listen to good sense, and act upon such. She's not falling apart, she's getting stronger. I can hardly believe the change, in such a short time and under these circumstances.
I think LaCasse has gotten his dates messed up at various points. I thought at one point he said the lockout was the same day as the yoga? I remember he said she was friendly earlier In the day when she called him about the lockout, but then her demeanor had changed completely later at the yoga class and he wondered what had happened or who she had spoken to in the interim. Then, he got the no contact email after the yoga class and that was the last time he heard from her before the murder.Based on the testimony of both Wendi and Lacasse, there didn’t appear to be a hard ‘break-up’ date – the email Wendi sent after the ‘awkward’ yoga session was a one-week ‘no contact’ request. Obviously if Wendi had knowledge or was directly involved, the ‘no contact’ email was essentially Wendi ending of the relationship and I understand why its viewed as the ‘break-up’.
Yes, maybe maybe he's claiming that he'd never dropped DA & HA so the overlaps on 6th Nov do not matter, in his version?He's been the family attorney for 7 years, helping with their financial legal issues. But wouldn't there need to be some signed document and contract that states DR is now representing DA in regards to the murder of DM? He's trying to imply she had engaged him before any charges had been laid.
Right.Based on the testimony of both Wendi and Lacasse, there didn’t appear to be a hard ‘break-up’ date – the email Wendi sent after the ‘awkward’ yoga session was a one-week ‘no contact’ request. Obviously if Wendi had knowledge or was directly involved, the ‘no contact’ email was essentially Wendi ending of the relationship and I understand why its viewed as the ‘break-up’.
Some people need to be broken.' Wendi! You need to give the performance of your life'
( an old Donna e mail)