Do we have any independent verification JS was even HOME that night?
If she was away for work, she needed someone to stay with Maddie, get her to school.
If JS was staying at a hotel, she was getting her information from SS. He could have sent her a video of MS getting ready for school, from his personal archive, so "I saw her getting dressed" could have been "I saw (a video of) her getting dressed". The night before, Maddie was "happy", no phone, "and that was it". Her (JS's) own observation? Or relayed to her by SS? Same as the morning events. "And that was it" is SS language, perhaps she used it because it's what she'd been told.
SS had no credible activity for JS in his interviews. Could it be, she simply wasn't home? Was at a hotel. While SS had unfettered access to Maddie which culminated, after years and years of horrid abuse, in murder.
This case breaks me. For Maddie.
JMO
Based on recorded interviews with MSM, we know JS told reporters she
last talked to MS on Sunday night. Here, JS actually described their conversation (i.e., talked about her birthday gifts, etc.).
However, I think MSM has conflated what JS told reporters versus what JS actually told police in her verbal and written sworn statement.
For example, with reporters, JS initially inserted herself in the act of driving MS to school ("we" dropped her off ").
However, from info that's been released thus far, nowhere that I'm aware of has JS stated that she had a visual of MS getting dressed for school or that she communicated with her child on Monday.
Instead, we have Deputy Joseph's incident report on the date MS was reported missing which details his interpretation of what the mother, JS, provided to him when questioned including that she
observed MS getting dressed for school, and that SS drove her to school, dropping her off at a certain location. (When talking to LE, JS never inserted herself in the act of taking MS away from the residence with the "we," as later recorded by MSM).
To be clear, I doubt JS used the word "observed."
Observed is trained police speak (i.e., utilizing the five senses).
JS may have told Deputy Joseph that she was in bed but heard MS in the shower, smelled her shampoo, heard her rummaging in her closet. Or she may have lied and said I saw my daughter put on her green sweater! IMO, it doesn't follow that if JS claimed to see her, she wouldn't also have claimed she talked to MS.
In his report, Deputy Joseph is reporting his interpretation of what the mother, JS, inferred to be MS getting ready for school. The report does not reflect any claim by JS that she talked to MS on Monday before school.
I trust there is also BWC of MS statements to LE. Only time will tell. MOO